mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Safe-Child-LLM: A Developmental Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Safety in Child-LLM Interactions

arXiv 2506.13510 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2025cs.CYcited by 7

On the map: LLM safety and security → Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails

Abstract (arXiv)

As Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly power applications used by children and adolescents, ensuring safe and age-appropriate interactions has become an urgent ethical imperative. Despite progress in AI safety, current evaluations predominantly focus on adults, neglecting the unique vulnerabilities of minors engaging with generative AI. We introduce Safe-Child-LLM, a comprehensive benchmark and dataset for systematically assessing LLM safety across two developmental stages: children (7-12) and adolescents (13-17). Our framework includes a novel multi-part dataset of 200 adversarial prompts, curated from red-teaming corpora (e.g., SG-Bench, HarmBench), with human-annotated labels for jailbreak success and a standardized 0-5 ethical refusal scale. Evaluating leading LLMs -- including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, LLaMA, DeepSeek, Grok, Vicuna, and Mistral -- we uncover critical safety deficiencies in child-facing scenarios. This work highlights the need for community-driven benchmarks to protect young users in LLM interactions. To promote transparency and collaborative advancement in ethical AI development, we are publicly releasing both our benchmark datasets and evaluation codebase at https://github.com/The-Responsible-AI-Initiative/Safe_Child_LLM_Benchmark.git

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 9 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2025.

Builds on

9 of 86 references.

References · 9

  1. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
  2. 2024JailbreakBench: An Open Robustness Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Language Modelscited by 536
  3. 2023Toxicity in ChatGPT: Analyzing Persona-assigned Language Modelscited by 360
  4. 2023PromptBench: A Unified Library for Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 44
  5. 2022Improving Human-AI Partnerships in Child Welfare: Understanding Worker Practices, Challenges, and Desires for Algorithmic Decision Supportcited by 39
  6. 2024A Piece of Theatre: Investigating How Teachers Design LLM Chatbots to Assist Adolescent Cyberbullying Educationcited by 12
  7. 2025MinorBench: A hand-built benchmark for content-based risks for childrencited by 9
  8. 2025LLM Safety for Childrencited by 5
  9. 2024Distributed agency in second language learning and teaching through generative AIcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 6.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025SproutBench: A Benchmark for Safe and Ethical Large Language Models for Youth
  2. 2025LLMs and Childhood Safety: Identifying Risks and Proposing a Protection Framework for Safe Child-LLM Interaction
  3. 2025Evaluating LLM Safety Across Child Development Stages: A Simulated Agent Approach
  4. 2026EduZone: A Framework for Evaluating LLM Safety for K-12 Students and Teachers
  5. 2024SG-Bench: Evaluating LLM Safety Generalization Across Diverse Tasks and Prompt Types
  6. 2026AICompanionBench: Benchmarking LLMs-as-Judges for AI Companion Safety
  7. 2025SAGE: A Generic Framework for LLM Safety Evaluation
  8. 2024Large Language Model Safety: A Holistic Survey