SproutBench: A Benchmark for Safe and Ethical Large Language Models for Youth
On the map: LLM safety and security → Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) in applications targeting children and adolescents necessitates a fundamental reassessment of prevailing AI safety frameworks, which are largely tailored to adult users and neglect the distinct developmental vulnerabilities of minors. This paper highlights key deficiencies in existing LLM safety benchmarks, including their inadequate coverage of age-specific cognitive, emotional, and social risks spanning early childhood (ages 0--6), middle childhood (7--12), and adolescence (13--18). To bridge these gaps, we introduce SproutBench, an innovative evaluation suite comprising 1,283 developmentally grounded adversarial prompts designed to probe risks such as emotional dependency, privacy violations, and imitation of hazardous behaviors. Through rigorous empirical evaluation of 47 diverse LLMs, we uncover substantial safety vulnerabilities, corroborated by robust inter-dimensional correlations (e.g., between Safety and Risk Prevention) and a notable inverse relationship between Interactivity and Age Appropriateness. These insights yield practical guidelines for advancing child-centric AI design and deployment.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Evaluating Cognitive Age Alignment in Interactive AI Agentscited by 2
- 2026CAREBench: A Child-Safety Risk Benchmark for Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026The Age of Curiosity Meets the Age of AI: Benchmarking Child Safety in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Beyond "I Can't Help With That": How Child Safety Experts Evaluate AI Chatbot Safetycited by 0
- 2026DistressBench: Evaluating Multi-Dimensional Crisis Support in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026DistressBench: Evaluating Multi-Dimensional Crisis Support in Large Language Models8 Oct 2026
- 2026Beyond "I Can't Help With That": How Child Safety Experts Evaluate AI Chatbot Safety8 Aug 2026
- 2026CAREBench: A Child-Safety Risk Benchmark for Language Models29 Jun 2026
- 2026The Age of Curiosity Meets the Age of AI: Benchmarking Child Safety in Large Language Models25 May 2026
- 2026Evaluating Cognitive Age Alignment in Interactive AI Agents18 May 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Safe-Child-LLM: A Developmental Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Safety in Child-LLM Interactions
- 2025LLMs and Childhood Safety: Identifying Risks and Proposing a Protection Framework for Safe Child-LLM Interaction
- 2026CR4T: Rewrite-Based Guardrails for Adolescent LLM Safety
- 2026EduZone: A Framework for Evaluating LLM Safety for K-12 Students and Teachers
- 2025Evaluating LLM Safety Across Child Development Stages: A Simulated Agent Approach
- 2025LLM Safety for Children
- 2024ALERT: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Safety through Red Teaming
- 2025SAGE: A Generic Framework for LLM Safety Evaluation