mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Uncovering Bias Paths with LLM-guided Causal Discovery: An Active Learning and Dynamic Scoring Approach

arXiv 2506.12227 ↗First posted 13 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring fairness in machine learning requires understanding how sensitive attributes like race or gender causally influence outcomes. Existing causal discovery (CD) methods often struggle to recover fairness-relevant pathways in the presence of noise, confounding, or data corruption. Large language models (LLMs) offer a complementary signal by leveraging semantic priors from variable metadata. We propose a hybrid LLM-guided CD framework that extends a breadth-first search strategy with active learning and dynamic scoring. Variable pairs are prioritized for querying using a composite score combining mutual information, partial correlation, and LLM confidence, enabling more efficient and robust structure discovery. To evaluate fairness sensitivity, we introduce a semi-synthetic benchmark based on the UCI Adult dataset, embedding domain-informed bias pathways alongside noise and latent confounders. We assess how well CD methods recover both global graph structure and fairness-critical paths (e.g., sex-->education-->income). Our results demonstrate that LLM-guided methods, including our active, dynamically scored variant, outperform baselines in recovering fairness-relevant structure under noisy conditions. We analyze when LLM-driven insights complement statistical dependencies and discuss implications for fairness auditing in high-stakes domains.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2025.

Builds on

17 of 47 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  3. 2018DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learningcited by 752
  4. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  5. 2023Causal Reasoning and Large Language Models: Opening a New Frontier for Causalitycited by 353
  6. 2017Avoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoningcited by 194
  7. 2018Path-Specific Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 181
  8. 2017Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophycited by 149
  9. 2017Fair Inference On Outcomescited by 144
  10. 2022DAGMA: Learning DAGs via M-matrices and a Log-Determinant Acyclicity Characterizationcited by 140
  11. 2021How much do language models copy from their training data? Evaluating linguistic novelty in text generation using RAVENcited by 124
  12. 2023Can large language models build causal graphs?cited by 73
5 more
  1. 2020Survey on Causal-based Machine Learning Fairness Notionscited by 54
  2. 2018Causal Reasoning for Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 51
  3. 2019Neuropathic Pain Diagnosis Simulator for Causal Discovery Algorithm Evaluationcited by 32
  4. 2024Integrating Large Language Models in Causal Discovery: A Statistical Causal Approachcited by 32
  5. 2024ALCM: Autonomous LLM-Augmented Causal Discovery Frameworkcited by 29

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.