Temporal cross-validation impacts multivariate time series subsequence anomaly detection evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Evaluating anomaly detection in multivariate time series (MTS) requires careful consideration of temporal dependencies, particularly when detecting subsequence anomalies common in fault detection scenarios. While time series cross-validation (TSCV) techniques aim to preserve temporal ordering during model evaluation, their impact on classifier performance remains underexplored. This study systematically investigates the effect of TSCV strategy on the precision-recall characteristics of classifiers trained to detect fault-like anomalies in MTS datasets. We compare walk-forward (WF) and sliding window (SW) methods across a range of validation partition configurations and classifier types, including shallow learners and deep learning (DL) classifiers. Results show that SW consistently yields higher median AUC-PR scores and reduced fold-to-fold performance variance, particularly for deep architectures sensitive to localized temporal continuity. Furthermore, we find that classifier generalization is sensitive to the number and structure of temporal partitions, with overlapping windows preserving fault signatures more effectively at lower fold counts. A classifier-level stratified analysis reveals that certain algorithms, such as random forests (RF), maintain stable performance across validation schemes, whereas others exhibit marked sensitivity. This study demonstrates that TSCV design in benchmarking anomaly detection models on streaming time series and provide guidance for selecting evaluation strategies in temporally structured learning environments.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2025.
Builds on
21 of 85 references.
References · 21
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
- 2018Deep learning for time series classification: a reviewcited by 576
- 2021Anomaly Transformer: Time Series Anomaly Detection with Association Discrepancycited by 394
- 2019InceptionTime: Finding AlexNet for Time Series Classificationcited by 387
- 2016Time Series Classification from Scratch with Deep Neural Networks: A Strong Baselinecited by 360
- 2019ROCKET: Exceptionally fast and accurate time series classification using random convolutional kernelscited by 339
- 2021Graph Neural Network-Based Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Seriescited by 301
- 2020A review on outlier/anomaly detection in time series datacited by 189
- 2020Multivariate Time-series Anomaly Detection via Graph Attention Networkcited by 167
- 2020Benchmarking Multivariate Time Series Classification Algorithmscited by 145
9 more
- 2017LSTM Fully Convolutional Networks for Time Series Classificationcited by 136
- 2018Multivariate LSTM-FCNs for Time Series Classificationcited by 120
- 2019Evaluating time series forecasting models: An empirical study on performance estimation methodscited by 53
- 2020A Comprehensive Guide to CAN IDS Data & Introduction of the ROAD Datasetcited by 19
- 2020CAN-D: A Modular Four-Step Pipeline for Comprehensively Decoding Controller Area Network Datacited by 9
- 2022Detecting CAN Masquerade Attacks with Signal Clustering Similaritycited by 5
- 2021IB-GAN: A Unified Approach for Multivariate Time Series Classification under Class Imbalancecited by 3
- 2024Evaluating lightweight unsupervised online IDS for masquerade attacks in CANcited by 3
- 2018Bad practices in evaluation methodology relevant to class-imbalanced problemscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.