Predictable Scale: Part II, Farseer: A Refined Scaling Law in Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Training Large Language Models (LLMs) is prohibitively expensive, creating a critical scaling gap where insights from small-scale experiments often fail to transfer to resource-intensive production systems, thereby hindering efficient innovation. To bridge this, we introduce Farseer, a novel and refined scaling law offering enhanced predictive accuracy across scales. By systematically constructing a model loss surface L(N,D), Farseer achieves a significantly better fit to empirical data than prior laws (e.g., Chinchilla's law). Our methodology yields accurate, robust, and highly generalizable predictions, demonstrating excellent extrapolation capabilities, improving upon Chinchilla's law by reducing extrapolation error by 433%. This allows for the reliable evaluation of competing training strategies across all (N,D) settings, enabling conclusions from small-scale ablation studies to be confidently extrapolated to predict large-scale performance. Furthermore, Farseer provides new insights into optimal compute allocation, better reflecting the nuanced demands of modern LLM training. To validate our approach, we trained an extensive suite of approximately 1,000 LLMs across diverse scales and configurations, consuming roughly 3 million NVIDIA H100 GPU hours. We are comprehensively open-sourcing all models, data, results, and logs at https://github.com/Farseer-Scaling-Law/Farseer to foster further research.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2025.
Builds on
36 of 45 references.
References · 36
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2021Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gophercited by 1,202
- 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,173
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 528
- 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 363
24 more
- 2024Inference Scaling Laws: An Empirical Analysis of Compute-Optimal Inference for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 290
- 2022Tensor Programs V: Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfercited by 288
- 2021Scaling Laws for Transfercited by 272
- 2024A Survey on Mixture of Experts in Large Language Modelscited by 237
- 2023Beyond Chinchilla-Optimal: Accounting for Inference in Language Model Scaling Lawscited by 159
- 2023The Quantization Model of Neural Scalingcited by 138
- 2024Observational Scaling Laws and the Predictability of Language Model Performancecited by 130
- 2024Scaling Laws for Precisioncited by 95
- 2024Chinchilla Scaling: A replication attemptcited by 72
- 2024How Feature Learning Can Improve Neural Scaling Lawscited by 56
- 2025Parameters vs FLOPs: Scaling Laws for Optimal Sparsity for Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelscited by 50
- 2024Scaling Laws for Downstream Task Performance of Large Language Modelscited by 49
- 2024Scaling Laws for Predicting Downstream Performance in LLMscited by 48
- 2024A Simple Model of Inference Scaling Lawscited by 36
- 2024Understanding Scaling Laws with Statistical and Approximation Theory for Transformer Neural Networks on Intrinsically Low-dimensional Datacited by 30
- 2024Scaling Laws For Dense Retrievalcited by 29
- 2025Communication-Efficient Language Model Training Scales Reliably and Robustly: Scaling Laws for DiLoCocited by 27
- 2021Scaling Law for Recommendation Models: Towards General-purpose User Representationscited by 26
- 2024Unraveling the Mystery of Scaling Laws: Part Icited by 24
- 2024ScalingFilter: Assessing Data Quality through Inverse Utilization of Scaling Lawscited by 15
- 2023Scaling Laws Do Not Scalecited by 13
- 2024Scaling Laws for Black box Adversarial Attackscited by 8
- 2025Unveiling Downstream Performance Scaling of LLMs: A Clustering-Based Perspectivecited by 7
- 2025Scaling Laws for Data-Efficient Visual Transfer Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026Neural Scaling Universality: If Exponents Are Fixed, Time to Understand Coefficientscited by 5
- 2026Spend Less, Fit Better: Budget-Efficient Scaling Law Fitting via Active Experiment Selectioncited by 3
- 2026Skaling: Chinchilla's Exponents Meet Kaplan's Couplingcited by 3
- 2026Configuration-to-Performance Scaling Law with Neural Ansatzcited by 2
- 2026Problems with Chinchilla Approach 2: Systematic Biases in IsoFLOP Parabola Fitscited by 0
- 2026Tokens-per-Parameter Coverage Is Critical for Robust LLM Scaling Law Extrapolationcited by 0
- 2026Skaling: Chinchilla's Exponents Meet Kaplan's Coupling7 Aug 2026
- 2026Neural Scaling Universality: If Exponents Are Fixed, Time to Understand Coefficients23 Jun 2026
- 2026Tokens-per-Parameter Coverage Is Critical for Robust LLM Scaling Law Extrapolation8 May 2026
- 2026Spend Less, Fit Better: Budget-Efficient Scaling Law Fitting via Active Experiment Selection24 Apr 2026
- 2026Problems with Chinchilla Approach 2: Systematic Biases in IsoFLOP Parabola Fits21 Mar 2026
- 2026Configuration-to-Performance Scaling Law with Neural Ansatz10 Feb 2026