mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Unveiling Downstream Performance Scaling of LLMs: A Clustering-Based Perspective

arXiv 2502.17262 ↗First posted 24 Feb 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The escalating scale and cost of Large Language Models (LLMs) training necessitate accurate pre-training prediction of downstream task performance for comprehensive understanding of scaling properties. This is challenged by: 1) the emergence phenomenon, where unpredictable capabilities appearing suddenly at critical model scales; and 2) uneven task difficulty and inconsistent performance scaling patterns, leading to high metric variability. Current prediction methods lack accuracy and reliability. We propose a Clustering-On-Difficulty (COD) framework for downstream performance prediction. The COD framework clusters tasks by their difficulty scaling features, thereby constructing a more stable and predictable task subset that exhibits well-behaved scaling characteristics with the increase of compute budget. We adopt a performance scaling law to predict cluster-wise performance with theoretical support. Predictable subset performance acts as an intermediate predictor for the full evaluation set. We further derive a mapping function to accurately extrapolate the performance of the subset to the full set. Applied to an LLM with 70B parameters, COD achieved a 1.55% average prediction error across eight key LLM benchmarks, thus providing actionable insights for scaling properties and training monitoring during LLM pre-training.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2025.

Builds on

43 of 63 references.

References · 43

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  4. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  5. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  6. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  7. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,703
  8. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
  9. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  10. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
  11. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
  12. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
31 more
  1. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,986
  2. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
  3. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
  4. 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,804
  5. 2020GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic Shardingcited by 1,631
  6. 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,480
  7. 2023GQA: Training Generalized Multi-Query Transformer Models from Multi-Head Checkpointscited by 1,346
  8. 2024DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelcited by 1,135
  9. 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 999
  10. 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 903
  11. 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 716
  12. 2023Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?cited by 523
  13. 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 522
  14. 2022Tensor Programs V: Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfercited by 288
  15. 2021Scaling Laws for Transfercited by 272
  16. 2022Revisiting Neural Scaling Laws in Language and Visioncited by 132
  17. 2024Observational Scaling Laws and the Predictability of Language Model Performancecited by 130
  18. 2024Scaling Laws with Vocabulary: Larger Models Deserve Larger Vocabulariescited by 118
  19. 2024Language models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream taskscited by 113
  20. 2022Broken Neural Scaling Lawscited by 109
  21. 2024Understanding Emergent Abilities of Language Models from the Loss Perspectivecited by 94
  22. 2024Smaller, Weaker, Yet Better: Training LLM Reasoners via Compute-Optimal Samplingcited by 61
  23. 2024Scaling Retrieval-Based Language Models with a Trillion-Token Datastorecited by 56
  24. 2024Scaling Laws for Predicting Downstream Performance in LLMscited by 48
  25. 2024Densing Law of LLMscited by 40
  26. 2024How predictable is language model benchmark performance?cited by 37
  27. 2024Establishing Task Scaling Laws via Compute-Efficient Model Ladderscited by 35
  28. 2023How Predictable Are Large Language Model Capabilities? A Case Study on BIG-benchcited by 34
  29. 2023Predicting Emergent Abilities with Infinite Resolution Evaluationcited by 28
  30. 2024CEval: A Benchmark for Evaluating Counterfactual Text Generationcited by 15
  31. 2024Do Neural Scaling Laws Exist on Graph Self-Supervised Learning?cited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

7 papers.