mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A quantum semantic framework for natural language processing

arXiv 2506.10077 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.IRcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Semantic degeneracy represents a fundamental property of natural language that extends beyond simple polysemy to encompass the combinatorial explosion of potential interpretations that emerges as semantic expressions increase in complexity. In this work, we argue this property imposes fundamental limitations on Large Language Models (LLMs) and other modern NLP systems, precisely because they operate within natural language itself. Using Kolmogorov complexity, we demonstrate that as an expression's complexity grows, the amount of contextual information required to reliably resolve its ambiguity explodes combinatorially. The computational intractability of recovering a single intended meaning for complex or ambiguous text therefore suggests that the classical view that linguistic forms possess intrinsic meaning in and of themselves is conceptually inadequate. We argue instead that meaning is dynamically actualized through an observer-dependent interpretive act, a process whose non-deterministic nature is most appropriately described by a non-classical, quantum-like logic. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a semantic Bell inequality test using diverse LLM agents. Our experiments yielded average CHSH expectation values from 1.2 to 2.8, with several runs producing values (e.g., 2.3-2.4) in significant violation of the classical boundary (|S|≤2), demonstrating that linguistic interpretation under ambiguity can exhibit non-classical contextuality, consistent with results from human cognition experiments. These results inherently imply that classical frequentist-based analytical approaches for natural language are necessarily lossy. Instead, we propose that Bayesian-style repeated sampling approaches can provide more practically useful and appropriate characterizations of linguistic meaning in context.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 92 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2025.

Builds on

19 of 92 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
  4. 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturecited by 1,039
  5. 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 639
  6. 2022Can language models learn from explanations in context?cited by 249
  7. 2023Do LLMs exhibit human-like response biases? A case study in survey designcited by 180
  8. 2023Conformal Language Modelingcited by 170
  9. 2020Detecting Emergent Intersectional Biases: Contextualized Word Embeddings Contain a Distribution of Human-like Biasescited by 167
  10. 2022Meaning without reference in large language modelscited by 76
  11. 2025LADDER: Self-Improving LLMs Through Recursive Problem Decompositioncited by 25
  12. 2025Continuous Thought Machinescited by 22
7 more
  1. 2025Transformer-Squared: Self-adaptive LLMscited by 16
  2. 2013A probabilistic framework for analysing the compositionality of conceptual combinationscited by 8
  3. 2017Spin and Wind Directions II: A Bell State Quantum Modelcited by 5
  4. 2013Introduction to the Special Issue on Quantum Cognitioncited by 4
  5. 2015Spin and Wind Directions I: Identifying Entanglement in Nature and Cognitioncited by 4
  6. 2025HMCF: A Human-in-the-loop Multi-Robot Collaboration Framework Based on Large Language Modelscited by 4
  7. 2016Advanced Analysis of Quantum Contextuality in a Psychophysical Double-Detection Experimentcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Semantic Wave Functions: Exploring Meaning in Large Language Models Through Quantum Formalism
  2. 2023Interventional Probing in High Dimensions: An NLI Case Study
  3. 2024Do Large Language Models Advocate for Inferentialism?
  4. 2026When the Pure Reasoner Meets the Impossible Object: Analytic vs. Synthetic Fine-Tuning and the Suppression of Genesis in Language Models
  5. 2025Semantic-Aware Logical Reasoning via a Semiotic Framework
  6. 2026Algebraic Quantum Intelligence: A New Framework for Reproducible Machine Creativity
  7. 2023Beyond Words: A Mathematical Framework for Interpreting Large Language Models
  8. 2023Large Language Models are In-Context Semantic Reasoners rather than Symbolic Reasoners