mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Beyond Words: A Mathematical Framework for Interpreting Large Language Models

arXiv 2311.03033 ↗First posted 6 Nov 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI tools that can generate and comprehend natural language text and other complex information. However, the field lacks a mathematical framework to systematically describe, compare and improve LLMs. We propose Hex a framework that clarifies key terms and concepts in LLM research, such as hallucinations, alignment, self-verification and chain-of-thought reasoning. The Hex framework offers a precise and consistent way to characterize LLMs, identify their strengths and weaknesses, and integrate new findings. Using Hex, we differentiate chain-of-thought reasoning from chain-of-thought prompting and establish the conditions under which they are equivalent. This distinction clarifies the basic assumptions behind chain-of-thought prompting and its implications for methods that use it, such as self-verification and prompt programming. Our goal is to provide a formal framework for LLMs that can help both researchers and practitioners explore new possibilities for generative AI. We do not claim to have a definitive solution, but rather a tool for opening up new research avenues. We argue that our formal definitions and results are crucial for advancing the discussion on how to build generative AI systems that are safe, reliable, fair and robust, especially in domains like healthcare and software engineering.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 9 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2023.

Builds on

9 of 16 references.

References · 9

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  2. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  3. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  4. 2023Large Language Modelscited by 774
  5. 2023Benchmarking Large Language Models for News Summarizationcited by 444
  6. 2023Causal Reasoning and Large Language Models: Opening a New Frontier for Causalitycited by 348
  7. 2023Large Language Model Alignment: A Surveycited by 241
  8. 2023Sources of Hallucination by Large Language Models on Inference Taskscited by 168
  9. 2023Fundamental Limitations of Alignment in Large Language Modelscited by 152

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Why Can Large Language Models Generate Correct Chain-of-Thoughts?
  2. 2024Chain-of-Thought in Large Language Models: Decoding, Projection, and Activation
  3. 2024General Purpose Verification for Chain of Thought Prompting
  4. 2026Understanding Large Language Models
  5. 2026Fragile Thoughts: How Large Language Models Handle Chain-of-Thought Perturbations
  6. 2026Understanding Artificial Theory of Mind: Perturbed Tasks and Reasoning in Large Language Models
  7. 2025Advancing Reasoning in Large Language Models: Promising Methods and Approaches
  8. 2025Reasoning Beyond Language: A Comprehensive Survey on Latent Chain-of-Thought Reasoning