Intent Factored Generation: Unleashing the Diversity in Your Language Model
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Obtaining multiple meaningfully diverse, high quality samples from Large Language Models for a fixed prompt remains an open challenge. Current methods for increasing diversity often only operate at the token-level, paraphrasing the same response. This is problematic because it leads to poor exploration on reasoning problems and to unengaging, repetitive conversational agents. To address this we propose Intent Factored Generation (IFG), factorising the sampling process into two stages. First, we sample a semantically dense intent, e.g., a summary or keywords. Second, we sample the final response conditioning on both the original prompt and the intent from the first stage. This allows us to use a higher temperature during the intent step to promote conceptual diversity, and a lower temperature during the final generation to ensure the outputs are coherent and self-consistent. Additionally, we find that prompting the model to explicitly state its intent for each step of the chain-of-thought before generating the step is beneficial for reasoning tasks. We demonstrate our method's effectiveness across a diverse set of tasks. We show this method improves both pass@k and Reinforcement Learning from Verifier Feedback on maths and code tasks. For instruction-tuning, we combine IFG with Direct Preference Optimisation to increase conversational diversity without sacrificing reward. Finally, we achieve higher diversity while maintaining the quality of generations on a general language modelling task, using a new dataset of reader comments and news articles that we collect and open-source. In summary, we present a simple method of increasing the sample diversity of LLMs while maintaining performance. This method can be implemented by changing the prompt and varying the temperature during generation, making it easy to integrate into many algorithms for gains across various applications.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.
6 papers.
- 2025Post-training Large Language Models for Diverse High-Quality Responsescited by 19
- 2026DPWriter: Reinforcement Learning with Diverse Planning Branching for Creative Writingcited by 6
- 2026Annotations Mitigate Post-Training Mode Collapsecited by 5
- 2026Diversified Scaling Inference in Time Series Foundation Modelscited by 3
- 2026When Do We Need LLMs? A Diagnostic for Language-Driven Banditscited by 0
- 2026Gacha Decoding: Eliciting Diverse Generations Through Instruction Followingcited by 0
- 2026Gacha Decoding: Eliciting Diverse Generations Through Instruction Following1 Oct 2026
- 2026Annotations Mitigate Post-Training Mode Collapse11 May 2026
- 2026When Do We Need LLMs? A Diagnostic for Language-Driven Bandits7 Apr 2026
- 2026Diversified Scaling Inference in Time Series Foundation Models24 Jan 2026
- 2026DPWriter: Reinforcement Learning with Diverse Planning Branching for Creative Writing14 Jan 2026
- 2025Post-training Large Language Models for Diverse High-Quality Responses5 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Asking a Language Model for Diverse Responses
- 2026Beyond Repeated Sampling: Learning Search Policies for LLM Reasoning
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate
- 2023Diversity of Thought Improves Reasoning Abilities of LLMs
- 2026ParamMem: Augmenting Language Agents with Parametric Reflective Memory
- 2026SD-E2: Semantic Exploration for Reasoning Under Token Budgets
- 2026Probabilistic Calibration Is a Trainable Capability in Language Models
- 2025SWI: Speaking with Intent in Large Language Models