mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Annotations Mitigate Post-Training Mode Collapse

arXiv 2605.09995 ↗First posted 11 May 2026cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Post-training (via supervised fine-tuning) improves instruction-following, but often induces semantic mode collapse by biasing models toward low-entropy fine-tuning data at the expense of the high-entropy pretraining distribution. Crucially, we find this trade-off worsens with scale. To close this semantic diversity gap, we propose annotation-anchored training, a principled method that enables models to adopt the preference-following behaviors of post-training without sacrificing the inherent diversity of pretraining. Our approach is simple: we pretrain on documents paired with semantic annotations, inducing a rich annotation distribution that reflects the full breadth of pretraining data, and we preserve this distribution during post-training. This lets us sample diverse annotations at inference time and use them as anchors to guide generation, effectively transferring pretraining's semantic richness into post-trained models. We find that models trained with annotation-anchored training can attain 6 × less diversity collapse than models trained with SFT, and improve with scale.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.

Builds on

47 of 48 references.

References · 47

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  5. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  6. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  7. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  8. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  9. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  10. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  11. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
  12. 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,077
35 more
  1. 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 1,053
  2. 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 819
  3. 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 799
  4. 2019CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generationcited by 762
  5. 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 629
  6. 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 503
  7. 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 491
  8. 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 483
  9. 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 470
  10. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 464
  11. 2023Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversitycited by 396
  12. 20242 OLMo 2 Furiouscited by 340
  13. 2016Diverse Beam Search: Decoding Diverse Solutions from Neural Sequence Modelscited by 301
  14. 2018Plan-And-Write: Towards Better Automatic Storytellingcited by 234
  15. 2022A Contrastive Framework for Neural Text Generationcited by 225
  16. 2017Learning Discourse-level Diversity for Neural Dialog Models using Conditional Variational Autoencoderscited by 222
  17. 2019Stochastic Beams and Where to Find Them: The Gumbel-Top-k Trick for Sampling Sequences Without Replacementcited by 211
  18. 2023Does Writing with Language Models Reduce Content Diversity?cited by 192
  19. 2025Artificial Hivemind: The Open-Ended Homogeneity of Language Models (and Beyond)cited by 141
  20. 2020Evaluating the Evaluation of Diversity in Natural Language Generationcited by 129
  21. 2022Locally Typical Samplingcited by 111
  22. 2025Verbalized Sampling: How to Mitigate Mode Collapse and Unlock LLM Diversitycited by 105
  23. 2018Language GANs Falling Shortcited by 97
  24. 2024Preserving Diversity in Supervised Fine-Tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 70
  25. 2025NoveltyBench: Evaluating Language Models for Humanlike Diversitycited by 66
  26. 2024One fish, two fish, but not the whole sea: Alignment reduces language models' conceptual diversitycited by 58
  27. 2025Base Models Beat Aligned Models at Randomness and Creativitycited by 51
  28. 2024Forcing Diffuse Distributions out of Language Modelscited by 48
  29. 2025The Price of Format: Diversity Collapse in LLMscited by 43
  30. 2024Detecting Mode Collapse in Language Models via Narrationcited by 24
  31. 2022Arithmetic Sampling: Parallel Diverse Decoding for Large Language Modelscited by 19
  32. 2025Parameterized Synthetic Text Generation with SimpleStoriescited by 10
  33. 2017Latent Variable Dialogue Models and their Diversitycited by 8
  34. 2025Optimizing Diversity and Quality through Base-Aligned Model Collaborationcited by 8
  35. 2025Intent Factored Generation: Unleashing the Diversity in Your Language Modelcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.