mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

D2R: dual regularization loss with collaborative adversarial generation for model robustness

arXiv 2506.07056 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2025cs.CV cs.CR cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The robustness of Deep Neural Network models is crucial for defending models against adversarial attacks. Recent defense methods have employed collaborative learning frameworks to enhance model robustness. Two key limitations of existing methods are (i) insufficient guidance of the target model via loss functions and (ii) non-collaborative adversarial generation. We, therefore, propose a dual regularization loss (D2R Loss) method and a collaborative adversarial generation (CAG) strategy for adversarial training. D2R loss includes two optimization steps. The adversarial distribution and clean distribution optimizations enhance the target model's robustness by leveraging the strengths of different loss functions obtained via a suitable function space exploration to focus more precisely on the target model's distribution. CAG generates adversarial samples using a gradient-based collaboration between guidance and target models. We conducted extensive experiments on three benchmark databases, including CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, Tiny ImageNet, and two popular target models, WideResNet34-10 and PreActResNet18. Our results show that D2R loss with CAG produces highly robust models.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2025.

Builds on

17 of 23 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  3. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
  4. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  5. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 678
  6. 2017Deep Mutual Learningcited by 628
  7. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 506
  8. 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
  9. 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 243
  10. 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
  11. 2019Adversarially Robust Distillationcited by 125
  12. 2022LAS-AT: Adversarial Training with Learnable Attack Strategycited by 95
5 more
  1. 2020Learnable Boundary Guided Adversarial Trainingcited by 93
  2. 2023Randomized Adversarial Training via Taylor Expansioncited by 28
  3. 2020SAT: Improving Adversarial Training via Curriculum-Based Loss Smoothingcited by 26
  4. 2023Mitigating Accuracy-Robustness Trade-off via Balanced Multi-Teacher Adversarial Distillationcited by 13
  5. 2024Dynamic Label Adversarial Training for Deep Learning Robustness Against Adversarial Attackscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.