CIVET: Systematic Evaluation of Understanding in VLMs
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved competitive performance in various tasks, their comprehension of the underlying structure and semantics of a scene remains understudied. To investigate the understanding of VLMs, we study their capability regarding object properties and relations in a controlled and interpretable manner. To this scope, we introduce CIVET, a novel and extensible framework for systematiC evaluatIon Via controllEd sTimuli. CIVET addresses the lack of standardized systematic evaluation for assessing VLMs' understanding, enabling researchers to test hypotheses with statistical rigor. With CIVET, we evaluate five state-of-the-art VLMs on exhaustive sets of stimuli, free from annotation noise, dataset-specific biases, and uncontrolled scene complexity. Our findings reveal that 1) current VLMs can accurately recognize only a limited set of basic object properties; 2) their performance heavily depends on the position of the object in the scene; 3) they struggle to understand basic relations among objects. Furthermore, a comparative evaluation with human annotators reveals that VLMs still fall short of achieving human-level accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 23 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2025.
Builds on
23 of 27 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024If CLIP Could Talk: Understanding Vision-Language Model Representations Through Their Preferred Concept Descriptions25 Mar
- 2023Synthesize, Diagnose, and Optimize: Towards Fine-Grained Vision-Language Understanding30 Nov
- 2023Teaching CLIP to Count to Ten23 Feb
Other references · 20
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
- 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,656
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,516
- 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,080
- 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,555
- 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
- 2024SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilitiescited by 706
- 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 610
- 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 529
8 more
- 2015Neural Module Networkscited by 376
- 2024Prismatic VLMs: Investigating the Design Space of Visually-Conditioned Language Modelscited by 339
- 2018TallyQA: Answering Complex Counting Questionscited by 153
- 2023Waffling around for Performance: Visual Classification with Random Words and Broad Conceptscited by 101
- 2024Understanding Hallucinations in Diffusion Models through Mode Interpolationcited by 91
- 2022There is a Time and Place for Reasoning Beyond the Imagecited by 22
- 2024Tackling Structural Hallucination in Image Translation with Local Diffusioncited by 21
- 2023Generate then Select: Open-ended Visual Question Answering Guided by World Knowledgecited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025[De|Re]constructing VLMs' Reasoning in Countingcited by 6
- 2026Auto-Comp: An Automated Pipeline for Scalable Compositional Probing of Contrastive Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026V-DyKnow: A Dynamic Benchmark for Time-Sensitive Knowledge in Vision Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Getting to the Point: Pointing Improves LVLMs at Countingcited by 0
- 2026Getting to the Point: Pointing Improves LVLMs at Counting23 Mar 2026
- 2026V-DyKnow: A Dynamic Benchmark for Time-Sensitive Knowledge in Vision Language Models17 Mar 2026
- 2026Auto-Comp: An Automated Pipeline for Scalable Compositional Probing of Contrastive Vision-Language Models2 Feb 2026
- 2025[De|Re]constructing VLMs' Reasoning in Counting22 Oct 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Vision language models have difficulty recognizing virtual objects
- 2025VLURes: Benchmarking VLM Visual and Linguistic Understanding in Low-Resource Languages
- 2025From Behavioral Performance to Internal Competence: Interpreting Vision-Language Models with VLM-Lens
- 2024VHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Models
- 2026Seeing Isn't Believing: Uncovering Blind Spots in Evaluator Vision-Language Models
- 2025Mixed Signals: Decoding VLMs' Reasoning and Underlying Bias in Vision-Language Conflict
- 2023ReForm-Eval: Evaluating Large Vision Language Models via Unified Re-Formulation of Task-Oriented Benchmarks
- 2025Hidden in plain sight: VLMs overlook their visual representations