Auto-Comp: An Automated Pipeline for Scalable Compositional Probing of Contrastive Vision-Language Models
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern vision-language models struggle with basic compositional reasoning, failing to bind attributes to objects or relations to their referents. Existing benchmarks either rely on noisy real images that conflate confounding visual variables with the reasoning failure, or use simplistic synthetic scenes lacking the realism modern VLMs are tuned for. We introduce Auto-Comp, a fully automated, concept-driven pipeline that bridges this gap by generating photorealistic compositional benchmarks at scale. Its core innovation is a textitparallel A/B construction: for each concept, the pipeline emits a textitMinimal sample (template caption, isolated objects on a white background) and a textitContextual sample (LLM-rewritten caption, objects embedded in a realistic scene), isolating core binding ability from visio-linguistic complexity. We instantiate textitfour task families spanning the two canonical axes of compositional binding: textitColor and textitShape-Color (attribute binding), and textitPosition and textitRelative Size (relational binding). We evaluate over 25 VLMs spanning CLIP, SigLIP, hard-negative-trained, and frontier generative models. The findings are consistent across architectures and scales: every model exhibits a large Swap-vs-Confusion gap, with low-entropy distractors (e.g., repeated objects or colors) exposing failures textitbeyond the known bag-of-words limitations. We further uncover a task-dependent trade-off: visio-linguistic context aids relational reasoning but hinders attribute binding through visual clutter. We publicly release the pipeline and benchmarks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 21 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2026.
Builds on
21 of 23 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2023SugarCrepe: Fixing Hackable Benchmarks for Vision-Language Compositionality26 Jun
- 2022CREPE: Can Vision-Language Foundation Models Reason Compositionally?13 Dec
- 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?4 Oct
Other references · 18
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
- 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,290
- 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,094
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
- 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
- 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,769
- 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,068
- 2021DenseCLIP: Language-Guided Dense Prediction with Context-Aware Promptingcited by 530
- 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 523
6 more
- 2023What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoningcited by 245
- 2021VALSE: A Task-Independent Benchmark for Vision and Language Models Centered on Linguistic Phenomenacited by 134
- 2024TripletCLIP: Improving Compositional Reasoning of CLIP via Synthetic Vision-Language Negativescited by 57
- 2023Synthesize, Diagnose, and Optimize: Towards Fine-Grained Vision-Language Understandingcited by 46
- 2024SUGARCREPE++ Dataset: Vision-Language Model Sensitivity to Semantic and Lexical Alterationscited by 42
- 2025CIVET: Systematic Evaluation of Understanding in VLMscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Object-centric Binding in Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining
- 2026Inference-Time Structural Reasoning for Compositional Vision-Language Understanding
- 2025VisRes Bench: On Evaluating the Visual Reasoning Capabilities of VLMs
- 2026Diagnosing the Sources of Compositional Failure in Vision-Language Models: A Controlled Analysis
- 2025A Good CREPE needs more than just Sugar: Investigating Biases in Compositional Vision-Language Benchmarks
- 2026Grid2Matrix: Revealing Digital Agnosia in Vision-Language Models
- 2025Long Story Short: Disentangling Compositionality and Long-Caption Understanding in Contrastive VLMs
- 2024In-Context Learning Improves Compositional Understanding of Vision-Language Models