mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TIMING: Temporality-Aware Integrated Gradients for Time Series Explanation

arXiv 2506.05035 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods for time series primarily estimate point-wise attribution magnitudes, while overlooking the directional impact on predictions, leading to suboptimal identification of significant points. Our analysis shows that conventional Integrated Gradients (IG) effectively capture critical points with both positive and negative impacts on predictions. However, current evaluation metrics fail to assess this capability, as they inadvertently cancel out opposing feature contributions. To address this limitation, we propose novel evaluation metrics-Cumulative Prediction Difference (CPD) and Cumulative Prediction Preservation (CPP)-to systematically assess whether attribution methods accurately identify significant positive and negative points in time series XAI. Under these metrics, conventional IG outperforms recent counterparts. However, directly applying IG to time series data may lead to suboptimal outcomes, as generated paths ignore temporal relationships and introduce out-of-distribution samples. To overcome these challenges, we introduce TIMING, which enhances IG by incorporating temporal awareness while maintaining its theoretical properties. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world time series benchmarks demonstrate that TIMING outperforms existing time series XAI baselines. Our code is available at https://github.com/drumpt/TIMING.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2025.

Builds on

25 of 46 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  5. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  6. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
  7. 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,367
  8. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
  9. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 939
  10. 2018The UCR Time Series Archivecited by 431
  11. 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 294
  12. 2020A Survey of the State of Explainable AI for Natural Language Processingcited by 206
13 more
  1. 2020Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting: Tutorial and Literature Surveycited by 117
  2. 2020Benchmarking Deep Learning Interpretability in Time Series Predictionscited by 102
  3. 2019Time Series Deconfounder: Estimating Treatment Effects over Time in the Presence of Hidden Confounderscited by 75
  4. 2021Explaining Time Series Predictions with Dynamic Maskscited by 73
  5. 2023Encoding Time-Series Explanations through Self-Supervised Model Behavior Consistencycited by 42
  6. 2017Clinical Intervention Prediction and Understanding using Deep Networkscited by 35
  7. 2024TimeX++: Learning Time-Series Explanations with Information Bottleneckcited by 33
  8. 2021Temporal Dependencies in Feature Importance for Time Series Predictionscited by 27
  9. 2023Learning Perturbations to Explain Time Series Predictionscited by 23
  10. 2023Inherently Interpretable Time Series Classification via Multiple Instance Learningcited by 23
  11. 2024Explaining Time Series via Contrastive and Locally Sparse Perturbationscited by 22
  12. 2023Interpretation of Time-Series Deep Models: A Surveycited by 15
  13. 2024TimeMIL: Advancing Multivariate Time Series Classification via a Time-aware Multiple Instance Learningcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 7.

10 papers.