Unpacking Let Alone: Human-Scale Models Generalize to a Rare Construction in Form but not Meaning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Humans have a remarkable ability to acquire and understand grammatical phenomena that are seen rarely, if ever, during childhood. Recent evidence suggests that language models with human-scale pretraining data may possess a similar ability by generalizing from frequent to rare constructions. However, it remains an open question how widespread this generalization ability is, and to what extent this knowledge extends to meanings of rare constructions, as opposed to just their forms. We fill this gap by testing human-scale transformer language models on their knowledge of both the form and meaning of the (rare and quirky) English LET-ALONE construction. To evaluate our LMs we construct a bespoke synthetic benchmark that targets syntactic and semantic properties of the construction. We find that human-scale LMs are sensitive to form, even when related constructions are filtered from the dataset. However, human-scale LMs do not make correct generalizations about LET-ALONE's meaning. These results point to an asymmetry in the current architectures' sample efficiency between language form and meaning, something which is not present in human language learners.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2025.
Builds on
22 of 48 references.
References · 22
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
- 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
- 2022What Artificial Neural Networks Can Tell Us About Human Language Acquisitioncited by 99
- 2025Findings of the BabyLM Challenge: Sample-Efficient Pretraining on Developmentally Plausible Corporacited by 88
- 2016Cognitive Science in the era of Artificial Intelligence: A roadmap for reverse-engineering the infant language-learnercited by 68
- 2024Language Models Learn Rare Phenomena from Less Rare Phenomena: The Case of the Missing AANNscited by 65
- 2022minicons: Enabling Flexible Behavioral and Representational Analyses of Transformer Language Modelscited by 58
- 2024Elements of World Knowledge (EWoK): A Cognition-Inspired Framework for Evaluating Basic World Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 55
- 2024Findings of the Second BabyLM Challenge: Sample-Efficient Pretraining on Developmentally Plausible Corporacited by 48
- 2023Trained on 100 million words and still in shape: BERT meets British National Corpuscited by 39
- 2024Filtered Corpus Training (FiCT) Shows that Language Models can Generalize from Indirect Evidencecited by 35
- 2020CxGBERT: BERT meets Construction Grammarcited by 32
10 more
- 2022Neural reality of argument structure constructionscited by 25
- 2023A Discerning Several Thousand Judgments: GPT-3 Rates the Article + Adjective + Numeral + Noun Constructioncited by 22
- 2023Not all layers are equally as important: Every Layer Counts BERTcited by 21
- 2025Both Direct and Indirect Evidence Contribute to Dative Alternation Preferences in Language Modelscited by 18
- 2024Constructions Are So Difficult That Even Large Language Models Get Them Right for the Wrong Reasonscited by 13
- 2025Do Construction Distributions Shape Formal Language Learning In German BabyLMs?cited by 11
- 2024What Goes Into a LM Acceptability Judgment? Rethinking the Impact of Frequency and Lengthcited by 10
- 2025Constructions are Revealed in Word Distributionscited by 6
- 2025Beyond Memorization: Assessing Semantic Generalization in Large Language Models Using Phrasal Constructionscited by 5
- 2025Construction Identification and Disambiguation Using BERT: A Case Study of NPNcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025SiniticMTError: A Machine Translation Dataset with Error Annotations for Sinitic Languagescited by 1
- 2026Function Words as Statistical Cues for Language Learningcited by 1
- 2026CxMP: A Linguistic Minimal-Pair Benchmark for Evaluating Constructional Understanding in Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Language Models Learn Constructional Semantics, Not To Mention Syntax: Investigating LM Understanding of Paired-Focus Constructionscited by 0
- 2026Language Models Learn Constructional Semantics, Not To Mention Syntax: Investigating LM Understanding of Paired-Focus Constructions29 May 2026
- 2026CxMP: A Linguistic Minimal-Pair Benchmark for Evaluating Constructional Understanding in Language Models25 Feb 2026
- 2026Function Words as Statistical Cues for Language Learning29 Jan 2026
- 2025SiniticMTError: A Machine Translation Dataset with Error Annotations for Sinitic Languages24 Sep 2025