mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Function Words as Statistical Cues for Language Learning

arXiv 2601.21191 ↗First posted 29 Jan 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

What statistical properties might support learning abstract grammatical knowledge from linear input? We address this question by examining the statistical distribution of function words. Function words have been argued to aid acquisition through three distributional properties: high frequency, reliable syntactic association, and phrase-boundary alignment. We conduct a cross-linguistic corpus analysis of 186 languages, which confirms that all three properties are universal. Using counterfactual language modeling and ablation experiments on English, we show that preserving these properties facilitates acquisition in neural learners, with a Goldilocks effect: function words must be frequent enough to be reliable, yet diverse enough to remain informative to structural dependency. Probing analyses further reveal that different learning conditions produce systematically different reliance on function words.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2026.

Builds on

16 of 71 references.

References · 16

  1. 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 1,003
  2. 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 723
  3. 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
  4. 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 320
  5. 2023Sudden Drops in the Loss: Syntax Acquisition, Phase Transitions, and Simplicity Bias in MLMscited by 124
  6. 2024Language Models Learn Rare Phenomena from Less Rare Phenomena: The Case of the Missing AANNscited by 65
  7. 2019Probing What Different NLP Tasks Teach Machines about Function Word Comprehensioncited by 44
  8. 2024Filtered Corpus Training (FiCT) Shows that Language Models can Generalize from Indirect Evidencecited by 35
  9. 2025Anything Goes? A Crosslinguistic Study of (Im)possible Language Learning in LMscited by 20
  10. 2025Both Direct and Indirect Evidence Contribute to Dative Alternation Preferences in Language Modelscited by 18
  11. 2025Language Models Grow Less Humanlike beyond Phase Transitioncited by 10
  12. 2023Learning the meanings of function words from grounded language using a visual question answering modelcited by 6
4 more
  1. 2025Unpacking Let Alone: Human-Scale Models Generalize to a Rare Construction in Form but not Meaningcited by 4
  2. 2025UD-English-CHILDES: A Collected Resource of Gold and Silver Universal Dependencies Trees for Child Language Interactionscited by 3
  3. 2025Biasless Language Models Learn Unnaturally: How LLMs Fail to Distinguish the Possible from the Impossiblecited by 3
  4. 2025Implicit In-Context Learning: Evidence from Artificial Language Experimentscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.