mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Do Construction Distributions Shape Formal Language Learning In German BabyLMs?

arXiv 2503.11593 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2025cs.CLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We analyze the influence of utterance-level construction distributions in German child-directed/child-available speech on the resulting word-level, syntactic and semantic competence (and their underlying learning trajectories) in small LMs, which we train on a novel collection of developmentally plausible language data for German. We find that trajectories are surprisingly robust for markedly different distributions of constructions in the training data, which have little effect on final accuracies and almost no effect on global learning trajectories. While syntax learning benefits from more complex utterances, word-level learning culminates in better scores with more fragmentary utterances. We argue that LMs trained on developmentally plausible data can contribute to debates on how conducive different kinds of linguistic stimuli are to language learning.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 107 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2025.

Builds on

25 of 107 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
  4. 2015The Goldilocks Principle: Reading Children's Books with Explicit Memory Representationscited by 108
  5. 2021The Shape of Learning Curves: a Reviewcited by 70
  6. 2016Cognitive Science in the era of Artificial Intelligence: A roadmap for reverse-engineering the infant language-learnercited by 68
  7. 2024Language Models Learn Rare Phenomena from Less Rare Phenomena: The Case of the Missing AANNscited by 65
  8. 2020Cross-Linguistic Syntactic Evaluation of Word Prediction Modelscited by 55
  9. 2024Findings of the Second BabyLM Challenge: Sample-Efficient Pretraining on Developmentally Plausible Corporacited by 48
  10. 2024Filtered Corpus Training (FiCT) Shows that Language Models can Generalize from Indirect Evidencecited by 35
  11. 2023BabySLM: language-acquisition-friendly benchmark of self-supervised spoken language modelscited by 29
  12. 2024[Call for Papers] The 2nd BabyLM Challenge: Sample-efficient pretraining on a developmentally plausible corpuscited by 26
13 more
  1. 2024Is Child-Directed Speech Effective Training Data for Language Models?cited by 24
  2. 2024Language Models as Models of Languagecited by 24
  3. 2025BabyLM Turns 3: Call for papers for the 2025 BabyLM workshopcited by 24
  4. 2023Construction Grammar Provides Unique Insight into Neural Language Modelscited by 13
  5. 2025XCOMPS: A Multilingual Benchmark of Conceptual Minimal Pairscited by 12
  6. 2024From Babble to Words: Pre-Training Language Models on Continuous Streams of Phonemescited by 11
  7. 2025Linguistic Generalizations are not Rules: Impacts on Evaluation of LMscited by 10
  8. 2020Recurrent babbling: evaluating the acquisition of grammar from limited input datacited by 9
  9. 2024Emergent Abilities in Reduced-Scale Generative Language Modelscited by 7
  10. 2025Subword models struggle with word learning, but surprisal hides itcited by 6
  11. 2025Constructions are Revealed in Word Distributionscited by 6
  12. 2024Small Language Models Also Work With Small Vocabularies: Probing the Linguistic Abilities of Grapheme- and Phoneme-Based Baby Llamascited by 5
  13. 2024What Should Baby Models Read? Exploring Sample-Efficient Data Composition on Model Performancecited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 4.

11 papers.