mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Grounded Vision-Language Interpreter for Long-Horizon Bimanual Task and Motion Planning

arXiv 2506.03270 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2025cs.RO cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While recent advances in vision-language models have accelerated language-guided robot planning, their black-box nature lacks the safety guarantees and interpretability crucial for real-world deployment. Conversely, classical symbolic planners offer rigorous safety verification but require significant expert knowledge for setup. Moreover, most existing methods are limited to single-arm pick-and-place tasks, leaving bimanual manipulation largely underexplored, despite its tightly interdependent subtasks and the need to explicitly manage inter-arm collisions. To bridge this gap, this paper proposes ViLaIn-TAMP, a hybrid planning framework for enabling verifiable, interpretable, and autonomous bimanual robot behaviors. ViLaIn-TAMP comprises three main components: (1) a Vision-Language Interpreter (ViLaIn) adapted from a prior work that converts multimodal inputs into structured PDDL problem specifications, (2) an integrated Task and Motion Planning (TAMP) system that grounds these specifications in actionable trajectory sequences through symbolic and geometric constraint reasoning, explicitly verifying feasibility before execution, and (3) a corrective planning (CP) module which receives structured motion failure feedback and feeds it as constraints back to ViLaIn to refine the specification. We design challenging bimanual manipulation tasks in a cooking domain to evaluate our framework, where experimental results show that ViLaIn-TAMP outperforms a VLM-as-a-planner baseline by 17.5% in mean success rate, with the CP module boosting it further by 32.9%. We further validate ViLaIn-TAMP on a physical dual-arm robotic system. Project page: https://omron-sinicx.github.io/ViLaIn-TAMP

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2025.

Builds on

32 of 41 references.

References · 32

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
  3. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
  4. 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,863
  5. 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,203
  6. 2022Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Modelscited by 1,081
  7. 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 711
  8. 2022ProgPrompt: Generating Situated Robot Task Plans using Large Language Modelscited by 611
  9. 2023LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiencycited by 501
  10. 2022VIMA: General Robot Manipulation with Multimodal Promptscited by 407
  11. 2023SayPlan: Grounding Large Language Models using 3D Scene Graphs for Scalable Robot Task Planningcited by 294
  12. 2020Integrated Task and Motion Planningcited by 290
20 more
  1. 2023Text2Motion: From Natural Language Instructions to Feasible Planscited by 224
  2. 2018PDDLStream: Integrating Symbolic Planners and Blackbox Samplers via Optimistic Adaptive Planningcited by 150
  3. 2023Task and Motion Planning with Large Language Models for Object Rearrangementcited by 141
  4. 2023Generalized Planning in PDDL Domains with Pretrained Large Language Modelscited by 139
  5. 2023Translating Natural Language to Planning Goals with Large-Language Modelscited by 133
  6. 2024AHA: A Vision-Language-Model for Detecting and Reasoning Over Failures in Robotic Manipulationcited by 125
  7. 2023AutoTAMP: Autoregressive Task and Motion Planning with LLMs as Translators and Checkerscited by 113
  8. 2014Reducing the Barrier to Entry of Complex Robotic Software: a MoveIt! Case Studycited by 89
  9. 2024LLM3:Large Language Model-based Task and Motion Planning with Motion Failure Reasoningcited by 63
  10. 2024Real-World Robot Applications of Foundation Models: A Reviewcited by 61
  11. 2021Learning Symbolic Operators for Task and Motion Planningcited by 58
  12. 2024Guiding Long-Horizon Task and Motion Planning with Vision Language Modelscited by 47
  13. 2021Long-Horizon Manipulation of Unknown Objects via Task and Motion Planning with Estimated Affordancescited by 40
  14. 2022CAPE: Corrective Actions from Precondition Errors using Large Language Modelscited by 30
  15. 2023Vision-Language Interpreter for Robot Task Planningcited by 30
  16. 2024ReplanVLM: Replanning Robotic Tasks with Visual Language Modelscited by 28
  17. 2024On the Limit of Language Models as Planning Formalizerscited by 18
  18. 2024Generating consistent PDDL domains with Large Language Modelscited by 15
  19. 2024CaStL: Constraints as Specifications through LLM Translation for Long-Horizon Task and Motion Planningcited by 10
  20. 2024SliceIt! -- A Dual Simulator Framework for Learning Robot Food Slicingcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Open-World Task and Motion Planning via Vision-Language Model Generated Constraints
  2. 2023Grounding Classical Task Planners via Vision-Language Models
  3. 2026SYMBOLIZER: Symbolic Model-free Task Planning with VLMs ↗
  4. 2024LLM-guided Task and Motion Planning using Knowledge-based Reasoning
  5. 2025ManipBench: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Low-Level Robot Manipulation
  6. 2026Leveraging Inter-object Affordances for Efficient Planning in Contact-rich Tasks
  7. 2025A Systematic Study of Large Language Models for Task and Motion Planning With PDDLStream
  8. 2026PDDL-ART: Autonomous Symbolic Abstraction From Demonstration For Long-Horizon Robotic Manipulation Using Vision-Language Models