Open-World Task and Motion Planning via Vision-Language Model Generated Constraints
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models
Abstract (arXiv)
Foundation models like Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at common sense vision and language tasks such as visual question answering. However, they cannot yet directly solve complex, long-horizon robot manipulation problems requiring precise continuous reasoning. Task and Motion Planning (TAMP) systems can handle long-horizon reasoning through discrete-continuous hybrid search over parameterized skills, but rely on detailed environment models and cannot interpret novel human objectives, such as arbitrary natural language goals. We propose integrating VLMs into TAMP systems by having them generate discrete and continuous language-parameterized constraints that enable open-world reasoning. Specifically, we use VLMs to generate discrete action ordering constraints that constrain TAMP search over action sequences, and continuous constraints in the form of code that augments traditional TAMP manipulation constraints. Experiments show that our approach, OWL-TAMP, outperforms baselines relying solely on TAMP or VLMs across several long-horizon manipulation tasks specified directly in natural language. We additionally demonstrate that OWL-TAMP can be deployed with an off-the-shelf TAMP system to solve challenging manipulation tasks on real-world hardware.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 37 of its 95 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2024.
Builds on
37 of 95 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Guiding Long-Horizon Task and Motion Planning with Vision Language Models3 Oct
- 2024Manipulate-Anything: Automating Real-World Robots using Vision-Language Models27 Jun
- 2024RoboPoint: A Vision-Language Model for Spatial Affordance Prediction for Robotics15 Jun
Other references · 34
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,274
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
- 2022Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Controlcited by 1,172
- 2022Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Modelscited by 1,057
- 2023VoxPoser: Composable 3D Value Maps for Robotic Manipulation with Language Modelscited by 733
- 2022ProgPrompt: Generating Situated Robot Task Plans using Large Language Modelscited by 598
- 2023Eureka: Human-Level Reward Design via Coding Large Language Modelscited by 542
- 2023LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiencycited by 496
- 2020Transporter Networks: Rearranging the Visual World for Robotic Manipulationcited by 342
- 2024ReKep: Spatio-Temporal Reasoning of Relational Keypoint Constraints for Robotic Manipulationcited by 305
22 more
- 2020Integrated Task and Motion Planningcited by 281
- 2023RVT: Robotic View Transformer for 3D Object Manipulationcited by 224
- 2023Look Before You Leap: Unveiling the Power of GPT-4V in Robotic Vision-Language Planningcited by 161
- 2018PDDLStream: Integrating Symbolic Planners and Blackbox Samplers via Optimistic Adaptive Planningcited by 147
- 2023Task and Motion Planning with Large Language Models for Object Rearrangementcited by 140
- 2023Translating Natural Language to Planning Goals with Large-Language Modelscited by 132
- 2023AutoTAMP: Autoregressive Task and Motion Planning with LLMs as Translators and Checkerscited by 111
- 2024CoPa: General Robotic Manipulation through Spatial Constraints of Parts with Foundation Modelscited by 97
- 2024Can Large Language Models Reason and Plan?cited by 82
- 2023Grounded Decoding: Guiding Text Generation with Grounded Models for Embodied Agentscited by 66
- 2024LLM3:Large Language Model-based Task and Motion Planning with Motion Failure Reasoningcited by 63
- 2019Online Replanning in Belief Space for Partially Observable Task and Motion Problemscited by 60
- 2023DoReMi: Grounding Language Model by Detecting and Recovering from Plan-Execution Misalignmentcited by 58
- 2022Predicate Invention for Bilevel Planningcited by 49
- 2024RePLan: Robotic Replanning with Perception and Language Modelscited by 39
- 2021Long-Horizon Manipulation of Unknown Objects via Task and Motion Planning with Estimated Affordancescited by 38
- 2024VisualPredicator: Learning Abstract World Models with Neuro-Symbolic Predicates for Robot Planningcited by 37
- 2024Trust the PRoC3S: Solving Long-Horizon Robotics Problems with LLMs and Constraint Satisfactioncited by 19
- 2022Learning Efficient Abstract Planning Models that Choose What to Predictcited by 17
- 2022STAP: Sequencing Task-Agnostic Policiescited by 17
- 2024CaStL: Constraints as Specifications through LLM Translation for Long-Horizon Task and Motion Planningcited by 10
- 2018Sampling-Based Methods for Factored Task and Motion Planningcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 7.
9 papers.
- 2026World Action Models are Zero-shot Policiescited by 411
- 2026PLanAR: Planning-Language-Grounded Agentic Reasoning for Robot Manipulationcited by 6
- 2025Using VLM Reasoning to Constrain Task and Motion Planningcited by 2
- 2026Coding Agents for Generalized Task and Motion Planning Problemscited by 1
- 2025Rational Inverse Reasoning: Few-Shot Imitation by Inferring Intent through Planningcited by 0
- 2026Human2Any: Human-to-Robot Transfer via Constraint-Aware Compositional Planningcited by 0
- 2026Learning to Assemble Novel Structures with Unfamiliar Parts under Semantic Constraintscited by 0
- 2026Evidence-Gated Task and Motion Planning with Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026TANDEM: Task and Motion Planning with As-Needed Demonstrations for Efficient Vision-Language-Action Model Fine-tuningcited by 0
- 2026Coding Agents for Generalized Task and Motion Planning Problems24 Sep 2026
- 2026TANDEM: Task and Motion Planning with As-Needed Demonstrations for Efficient Vision-Language-Action Model Fine-tuning23 Sep 2026
- 2026Evidence-Gated Task and Motion Planning with Vision-Language Models20 Aug 2026
- 2026Learning to Assemble Novel Structures with Unfamiliar Parts under Semantic Constraints13 Aug 2026
- 2026Human2Any: Human-to-Robot Transfer via Constraint-Aware Compositional Planning27 Jun 2026
- 2026World Action Models are Zero-shot Policies17 Feb 2026
- 2026PLanAR: Planning-Language-Grounded Agentic Reasoning for Robot Manipulation2 Feb 2026
- 2025Using VLM Reasoning to Constrain Task and Motion Planning29 Oct 2025
- 2025Rational Inverse Reasoning: Few-Shot Imitation by Inferring Intent through Planning12 Aug 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025A Systematic Study of Large Language Models for Task and Motion Planning With PDDLStream
- 2025Reflective Planning: Vision-Language Models for Multi-Stage Long-Horizon Robotic Manipulation
- 2025Reinforced Embodied Planning with Verifiable Reward for Real-World Robotic Manipulation
- 2026NovaPlan: Zero-Shot Long-Horizon Manipulation via Closed-Loop Video Language Planning
- 2026Bridging Semantics and Physics with Constrained LLMs for Safe and Trustworthy Robotic Manipulation ↗
- 2026Language Movement Primitives: Grounding Language Models in Robot Motion
- 2023Text2Motion: From Natural Language Instructions to Feasible Plans
- 2023Spatial Reasoning via Deep Vision Models for Robotic Sequential Manipulation