MIRROR: Converging Cognitive Principles as Computational Mechanisms for AI Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Multiple cognitive theories -- Global Workspace Theory, reconstructive episodic memory, inner speech, and complementary learning systems -- converge on a shared set of architectural principles: parallel specialized processing, integrative synthesis into a bounded unified representation, and reconstructive rather than accumulative maintenance. We test whether these converging principles provide computational advantages when implemented in AI systems. MIRROR operationalizes each principle as a concrete mechanism: an Inner Monologue Manager generates parallel cognitive threads (Goals, Reasoning, Memory), a Cognitive Controller synthesizes these into a bounded first-person narrative that is fully reconstructed each turn, and a temporal separation between fast response generation and slow deliberative consolidation mirrors complementary learning dynamics. Evaluated on multi-turn dialogue requiring constraint maintenance under attentional interference, MIRROR yields 21% relative improvement across seven architecturally diverse language models. Ablation studies test the theoretical predictions directly: reconstructive synthesis improves all seven models (+5-20%); the integrated system outperforms either component alone for six of seven models, confirming that parallel exploration and integrative synthesis are complementary; and gains concentrate where theories predict -- under high attentional load where global availability of integrated information is most needed. These results demonstrate that converging principles from human cognition provide architecture-general computational advantages, and generate testable behavioral predictions about working memory, inner speech, and memory consolidation. Project page available at https://www.arcarae.com/research/MIRROR and code at https://github.com/arcarae/MIRROR.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 8 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2025.
Builds on
8 of 36 references.
References · 8
- 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,389
- 2023Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language Modelscited by 574
- 2023Cognitive Architectures for Language Agentscited by 429
- 2018Machine Theory of Mindcited by 226
- 2023Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousnesscited by 104
- 2025Sleep-time Compute: Beyond Inference Scaling at Test-timecited by 43
- 2022On the link between conscious function and general intelligence in humans and machinescited by 16
- 2024CURATe: Benchmarking Personalised Alignment of Conversational AI Assistantscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Governing Reflective Human-AI Collaboration: A Framework for Epistemic Scaffolding and Traceable Reasoning
- 2025Emergent Cognitive Convergence via Implementation: Structured Cognitive Loop Reflecting Four Theories of Mind
- 2025Atomic Skills are the Prerequisite: When Reinforcement Learning Synthesizes Compositional Reasoning, and When It Only Amplifies
- 2025Cognitive AI framework 2.0: advances in the simulation of human thought
- 2026Where Cognition Lives: Dissecting Emergent from Computed Function in a Minimal Complete Cognitive Architecture
- 2026From Consumption to Reflection: Designing Human-AI Relations for Stable Reasoning
- 2024Mirror: A Multiple-perspective Self-Reflection Method for Knowledge-rich Reasoning
- 2025Ask-to-Clarify: Resolving Instruction Ambiguity through Multi-turn Dialogue