mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Harnessing Negative Signals: Reinforcement Distillation from Teacher Data for LLM Reasoning

arXiv 2505.24850 ↗First posted 30 May 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

also in 2 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in model distillation show that data from advanced reasoning models can effectively train smaller student models. However, standard practices discard incorrect reasoning traces -- valuable, yet underutilized data. This paper addresses the critical question: How can both positive and negative distilled reasoning traces be effectively leveraged to maximize LLM reasoning performance in an offline setting? We employ a two-stage training recipe: first, Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on positive traces, followed by a refinement stage using both positive and negative traces. We find that a simple REINFORCE-style objective, which we term the Reinforcement Distillation (REDI) objective, outperforms established preference optimization methods like DPO and SimPO in this distillation context. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach. Notably, our Qwen-REDI-1.5B model, trained on just 131k traces from the open Open-R1 dataset, achieves an 83.1% score on MATH-500. Its performance matches that of DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B, a model trained on 800k proprietary data. This result showcases the remarkable data efficiency of utilizing previously discarded negative traces.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 15 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2025.

Builds on

15 of 34 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025TemplateRL: Structured Template-Guided Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning21 May
  2. 2025Learning to Reason under Off-Policy Guidance21 Apr
  3. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?18 Apr
  4. 2025SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wild24 Mar
  5. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning22 Jan
  6. 2023Let's Verify Step by Step31 May
  7. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May

Other references · 8

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  2. 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,831
  3. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,392
  4. 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,341
  5. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,244
  6. 2025LIMO: Less is More for Reasoningcited by 498
  7. 2025Light-R1: Curriculum SFT, DPO and RL for Long COT from Scratch and Beyondcited by 175
  8. 20243D-Properties: Identifying Challenges in DPO and Charting a Path Forwardcited by 24

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025The Surprising Effectiveness of Negative Reinforcement in LLM Reasoning
  2. 2026Reinforcement-aware Knowledge Distillation for LLM Reasoning
  3. 2025Unearthing Gems from Stones: Policy Optimization with Negative Sample Augmentation for LLM Reasoning
  4. 2025Beyond Scaling Law: A Data-Efficient Distillation Framework for Reasoning
  5. 2025Reinforcement Learning vs. Distillation: Understanding Accuracy and Capability in LLM Reasoning
  6. 2026Skill-Conditioned Gated Self-Distillation for LLM Reasoning
  7. 2025Revisiting Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning from A Cross-Domain Perspective
  8. 2025RLKD: Distilling LLMs' Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning