mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Impact of Bottleneck Layers and Skip Connections on the Generalization of Linear Denoising Autoencoders

arXiv 2505.24668 ↗First posted 30 May 2025stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern deep neural networks exhibit strong generalization even in highly overparameterized regimes. Significant progress has been made to understand this phenomenon in the context of supervised learning, but for unsupervised tasks such as denoising, several open questions remain. While some recent works have successfully characterized the test error of the linear denoising problem, they are limited to linear models (one-layer network). In this work, we focus on two-layer linear denoising autoencoders trained under gradient flow, incorporating two key ingredients of modern deep learning architectures: A low-dimensional bottleneck layer that effectively enforces a rank constraint on the learned solution, as well as the possibility of a skip connection that bypasses the bottleneck. We derive closed-form expressions for all critical points of this model under product regularization, and in particular describe its global minimizer under the minimum-norm principle. From there, we derive the test risk formula in the overparameterized regime, both for models with and without skip connections. Our analysis reveals two interesting phenomena: Firstly, the bottleneck layer introduces an additional complexity measure akin to the classical bias-variance trade-off -- increasing the bottleneck width reduces bias but introduces variance, and vice versa. Secondly, skip connection can mitigate the variance in denoising autoencoders -- especially when the model is mildly overparameterized. We further analyze the impact of skip connections in denoising autoencoder using random matrix theory and support our claims with numerical evidence.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2025.

Builds on

20 of 48 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  4. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
  5. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 672
  6. 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 549
  7. 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 513
  8. 2016Deep Learning without Poor Local Minimacited by 234
  9. 2023High-dimensional analysis of double descent for linear regression with random projectionscited by 47
  10. 2019Pure and Spurious Critical Points: a Geometric Study of Linear Networkscited by 33
  11. 2023A U-turn on Double Descent: Rethinking Parameter Counting in Statistical Learningcited by 33
  12. 2021The loss landscape of deep linear neural networks: a second-order analysiscited by 24
8 more
  1. 2019A Random Matrix Perspective on Mixtures of Nonlinearities for Deep Learningcited by 20
  2. 2023High-dimensional Asymptotics of Denoising Autoencoderscited by 19
  3. 2018Learning Dynamics of Linear Denoising Autoencoderscited by 16
  4. 2023Double Descent and Overfitting under Noisy Inputs and Distribution Shift for Linear Denoiserscited by 14
  5. 2020Dimensionality reduction, regularization, and generalization in overparameterized regressionscited by 13
  6. 2017Critical Points of Neural Networks: Analytical Forms and Landscape Propertiescited by 7
  7. 2020Asymptotic errors for convex penalized linear regression beyond Gaussian matricescited by 6
  8. 2023Does Double Descent Occur in Self-Supervised Learning?cited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.