mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Does Double Descent Occur in Self-Supervised Learning?

arXiv 2307.07872 ↗First posted 15 Jul 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most investigations into double descent have focused on supervised models while the few works studying self-supervised settings find a surprising lack of the phenomenon. These results imply that double descent may not exist in self-supervised models. We show this empirically using a standard and linear autoencoder, two previously unstudied settings. The test loss is found to have either a classical U-shape or to monotonically decrease instead of exhibiting a double-descent curve. We hope that further work on this will help elucidate the theoretical underpinnings of this phenomenon.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2023.

Builds on

9 of 13 references.

References · 9

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
  3. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 672
  4. 2018A Modern Take on the Bias-Variance Tradeoff in Neural Networkscited by 65
  5. 2023High-dimensional analysis of double descent for linear regression with random projectionscited by 47
  6. 2019More Data Can Hurt for Linear Regression: Sample-wise Double Descentcited by 37
  7. 2019Exact expressions for double descent and implicit regularization via surrogate random designcited by 35
  8. 2020Subspace Fitting Meets Regression: The Effects of Supervision and Orthonormality Constraints on Double Descent of Generalization Errorscited by 11
  9. 2021Double Descent and Other Interpolation Phenomena in GANscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

3 papers.