Does Double Descent Occur in Self-Supervised Learning?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Most investigations into double descent have focused on supervised models while the few works studying self-supervised settings find a surprising lack of the phenomenon. These results imply that double descent may not exist in self-supervised models. We show this empirically using a standard and linear autoencoder, two previously unstudied settings. The test loss is found to have either a classical U-shape or to monotonically decrease instead of exhibiting a double-descent curve. We hope that further work on this will help elucidate the theoretical underpinnings of this phenomenon.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2023.
Builds on
9 of 13 references.
References · 9
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 672
- 2018A Modern Take on the Bias-Variance Tradeoff in Neural Networkscited by 65
- 2023High-dimensional analysis of double descent for linear regression with random projectionscited by 47
- 2019More Data Can Hurt for Linear Regression: Sample-wise Double Descentcited by 37
- 2019Exact expressions for double descent and implicit regularization via surrogate random designcited by 35
- 2020Subspace Fitting Meets Regression: The Effects of Supervision and Orthonormality Constraints on Double Descent of Generalization Errorscited by 11
- 2021Double Descent and Other Interpolation Phenomena in GANscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
3 papers.