Critical Points of Neural Networks: Analytical Forms and Landscape Properties
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Due to the success of deep learning to solving a variety of challenging machine learning tasks, there is a rising interest in understanding loss functions for training neural networks from a theoretical aspect. Particularly, the properties of critical points and the landscape around them are of importance to determine the convergence performance of optimization algorithms. In this paper, we provide full (necessary and sufficient) characterization of the analytical forms for the critical points (as well as global minimizers) of the square loss functions for various neural networks. We show that the analytical forms of the critical points characterize the values of the corresponding loss functions as well as the necessary and sufficient conditions to achieve global minimum. Furthermore, we exploit the analytical forms of the critical points to characterize the landscape properties for the loss functions of these neural networks. One particular conclusion is that: The loss function of linear networks has no spurious local minimum, while the loss function of one-hidden-layer nonlinear networks with ReLU activation function does have local minimum that is not global minimum.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2022When Expressivity Meets Trainability: Fewer than n Neurons Can Workcited by 8
- 2021Spurious Local Minima Are Common for Deep Neural Networks with Piecewise Linear Activationscited by 7
- 2022Understanding Deep Learning via Decision Boundarycited by 7
- 2021The Landscape of Multi-Layer Linear Neural Network From the Perspective of Algebraic Geometrycited by 1
- 2022Demystifying the Global Convergence Puzzle of Learning Over-parameterized ReLU Nets in Very High Dimensionscited by 0
- 2025Impact of Bottleneck Layers and Skip Connections on the Generalization of Linear Denoising Autoencoderscited by 0
- 2026Benign Loss Landscapes Can Coexist with Worst-Case Hardnesscited by 0
- 2026Benign Loss Landscapes Can Coexist with Worst-Case Hardness11 Sep 2026
- 2025Impact of Bottleneck Layers and Skip Connections on the Generalization of Linear Denoising Autoencoders30 May 2025
- 2022When Expressivity Meets Trainability: Fewer than n Neurons Can Work21 Oct 2022
- 2022Demystifying the Global Convergence Puzzle of Learning Over-parameterized ReLU Nets in Very High Dimensions5 Jun 2022
- 2022Understanding Deep Learning via Decision Boundary3 Jun 2022
- 2021Spurious Local Minima Are Common for Deep Neural Networks with Piecewise Linear Activations25 Feb 2021
- 2021The Landscape of Multi-Layer Linear Neural Network From the Perspective of Algebraic Geometry30 Jan 2021