mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding the bias-variance tradeoff of Bregman divergences

arXiv 2202.04167 ↗First posted 8 Feb 2022stat.ML cs.LG math.PRcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper builds upon the work of Pfau (2013), which generalized the bias variance tradeoff to any Bregman divergence loss function. Pfau (2013) showed that for Bregman divergences, the bias and variances are defined with respect to a central label, defined as the mean of the label variable, and a central prediction, of a more complex form. We show that, similarly to the label, the central prediction can be interpreted as the mean of a random variable, where the mean operates in a dual space defined by the loss function itself. Viewing the bias-variance tradeoff through operations taken in dual space, we subsequently derive several results of interest. In particular, (a) the variance terms satisfy a generalized law of total variance; (b) if a source of randomness cannot be controlled, its contribution to the bias and variance has a closed form; (c) there exist natural ensembling operations in the label and prediction spaces which reduce the variance and do not affect the bias.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2022.

Builds on

5 of 20 references.

References · 5

  1. 2020Rethinking Bias-Variance Trade-off for Generalization of Neural Networkscited by 107
  2. 2020Double Trouble in Double Descent : Bias and Variance(s) in the Lazy Regimecited by 95
  3. 2020Understanding Double Descent Requires a Fine-Grained Bias-Variance Decompositioncited by 75
  4. 2018A Modern Take on the Bias-Variance Tradeoff in Neural Networkscited by 64
  5. 2019Unifying mirror descent and dual averagingcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

10 papers.