Preference Learning with Response Time: Robust Losses and Guarantees
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper investigates the integration of response time data into human preference learning frameworks for more effective reward model elicitation. While binary preference data has become fundamental in fine-tuning foundation models, generative AI systems, and other large-scale models, the valuable temporal information inherent in user decision-making remains largely unexploited. We propose novel methodologies to incorporate response time information alongside binary choice data, leveraging the Evidence Accumulation Drift Diffusion (EZ) model, under which response time is informative of the preference strength. We develop Neyman-orthogonal loss functions that achieve oracle convergence rates for reward model learning, matching the theoretical optimal rates that would be attained if the expected response times for each query were known a priori. Our theoretical analysis demonstrates that for linear reward functions, conventional preference learning suffers from error rates that scale exponentially with reward magnitude. In contrast, our response time-augmented approach reduces this to polynomial scaling, representing a significant improvement in sample efficiency. We extend these guarantees to non-parametric reward function spaces, establishing convergence properties for more complex, realistic reward models. Our extensive experiments validate our theoretical findings in the context of preference learning over images.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 32 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2025.
Builds on
32 of 66 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2023A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback22 Dec
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
- 2023Principled Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback from Pairwise or K-wise Comparisons26 Jan
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback12 Apr
- 2021Skill Preferences: Learning to Extract and Execute Robotic Skills from Human Feedback11 Aug
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences18 Sep
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun
Other references · 25
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2023Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 977
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 912
- 2023Diffusion Model Alignment Using Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 790
- 2023Human Preference Score: Better Aligning Text-to-Image Models with Human Preferencecited by 287
- 2024Preference Fine-Tuning of LLMs Should Leverage Suboptimal, On-Policy Datacited by 185
- 2019Orthogonal Statistical Learningcited by 151
- 2020Improved Optimistic Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 118
- 2018Preference-based Online Learning with Dueling Bandits: A Surveycited by 102
- 2022Few-Shot Preference Learning for Human-in-the-Loop RLcited by 87
- 2021A survey on high-dimensional Gaussian process modeling with application to Bayesian optimizationcited by 77
13 more
- 2020Instance-Wise Minimax-Optimal Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 57
- 2022Jointly Efficient and Optimal Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 41
- 2020Adversarial Estimation of Riesz Representerscited by 35
- 2021Knowledge Distillation as Semiparametric Inferencecited by 29
- 2021Learning Reward Functions from Scale Feedbackcited by 24
- 2024A Survey on Human Preference Learning for Large Language Modelscited by 24
- 2024Generalized Linear Bandits with Limited Adaptivitycited by 22
- 2022PrefRec: Recommender Systems with Human Preferences for Reinforcing Long-term User Engagementcited by 21
- 2018PG-TS: Improved Thompson Sampling for Logistic Contextual Banditscited by 19
- 2022Human Preferences as Dueling Banditscited by 14
- 2022On the inability of Gaussian process regression to optimally learn compositional functionscited by 7
- 2024Enhancing Preference-based Linear Bandits via Human Response Timecited by 3
- 2023A Semi-Parametric Model for Decision Making in High-Dimensional Sensory Discrimination Taskscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025ResponseRank: Data-Efficient Reward Modeling through Preference Strength Learning
- 2026Beyond Binary Preferences: A Principled Framework for Reward Modeling with Ordinal Feedback
- 2025Capturing Individual Human Preferences with Reward Features
- 2026Reward Learning from Best-of-N Preference Data: Targets, Tradeoffs, and Design Principles
- 2026In-Context Reward Adaptation for Robust Preference Modeling
- 2025Probing Preference Representations: A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation and Analysis Method for Reward Models
- 2024Towards Comprehensive Preference Data Collection for Reward Modeling
- 2025PILAF: Optimal Human Preference Sampling for Reward Modeling