mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Comprehensive Preference Data Collection for Reward Modeling

arXiv 2406.16486 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2024cs.AIcited by 5

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) facilitates the alignment of large language models (LLMs) with human preferences, thereby enhancing the quality of responses generated. A critical component of RLHF is the reward model, which is trained on preference data and outputs a scalar reward during the inference stage. However, the collection of preference data still lacks thorough investigation. Recent studies indicate that preference data is collected either by AI or humans, where chosen and rejected instances are identified among pairwise responses. We question whether this process effectively filters out noise and ensures sufficient diversity in collected data. To address these concerns, for the first time, we propose a comprehensive framework for preference data collection, decomposing the process into four incremental steps: Prompt Generation, Response Generation, Response Filtering, and Human Labeling. This structured approach ensures the collection of high-quality preferences while reducing reliance on human labor. We conducted comprehensive experiments based on the data collected at different stages, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed data collection method.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 15 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2024.

Builds on

15 of 16 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Improving Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Efficient Reward Model Ensemble30 Jan
  2. 2024WARM: On the Benefits of Weight Averaged Reward Models22 Jan
  3. 2024Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part II: Reward Modeling11 Jan
  4. 2023Helping or Herding? Reward Model Ensembles Mitigate but do not Eliminate Reward Hacking14 Dec
  5. 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignment13 Apr
  6. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback12 Apr
  7. 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback17 Dec
  8. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences18 Sep

Other references · 7

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  3. 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 717
  4. 2023Baichuan 2: Open Large-scale Language Modelscited by 664
  5. 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 288
  6. 2021Efficient Large Scale Language Modeling with Mixtures of Expertscited by 175
  7. 2024Theoretical guarantees on the best-of-n alignment policycited by 116

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Towards Data-Centric RLHF: Simple Metrics for Preference Dataset Comparison
  2. 2025PILAF: Optimal Human Preference Sampling for Reward Modeling
  3. 2024Towards Understanding the Influence of Reward Margin on Preference Model Performance
  4. 2024West-of-N: Synthetic Preferences for Self-Improving Reward Models
  5. 2026Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: A Statistical Perspective
  6. 2025Influencing Humans to Conform to Preference Models for RLHF
  7. 2025Capturing Individual Human Preferences with Reward Features
  8. 2024Data-Centric Human Preference with Rationales for Direct Preference Alignment