Robust and Explainable Detector of Time Series Anomaly via Augmenting Multiclass Pseudo-Anomalies
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Unsupervised anomaly detection in time series has been a pivotal research area for decades. Current mainstream approaches focus on learning normality, on the assumption that all or most of the samples in the training set are normal. However, anomalies in the training set (i.e., anomaly contamination) can be misleading. Recent studies employ data augmentation to generate pseudo-anomalies and learn the boundary separating the training samples from the augmented samples. Although this approach mitigates anomaly contamination if augmented samples mimic unseen real anomalies, it suffers from several limitations. (1) Covering a wide range of time series anomalies is challenging. (2) It disregards augmented samples that resemble normal samples (i.e., false anomalies). (3) It places too much trust in the labels of training and augmented samples. In response, we propose RedLamp, which employs diverse data augmentations to generate multiclass pseudo-anomalies and learns the multiclass boundary. Such multiclass pseudo-anomalies cover a wide variety of time series anomalies. We conduct multiclass classification using soft labels, which prevents the model from being overconfident and ensures its robustness against contaminated/false anomalies. The learned latent space is inherently explainable as it is trained to separate pseudo-anomalies into multiclasses. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of RedLamp in anomaly detection and its robustness against anomaly contamination.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2025.
Builds on
26 of 59 references.
References · 26
- 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,628
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 942
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
- 2021CutPaste: Self-Supervised Learning for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 531
- 2021DRAEM -- A discriminatively trained reconstruction embedding for surface anomaly detectioncited by 514
- 2018Detecting Spacecraft Anomalies Using LSTMs and Nonparametric Dynamic Thresholdingcited by 410
- 2021Anomaly Transformer: Time Series Anomaly Detection with Association Discrepancycited by 394
- 2021Graph Neural Network-Based Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Seriescited by 301
- 2020Time Series Data Augmentation for Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 226
- 2016LSTM-based Encoder-Decoder for Multi-sensor Anomaly Detectioncited by 215
- 2022TranAD: Deep Transformer Networks for Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Series Datacited by 214
- 2017A Multimodal Anomaly Detector for Robot-Assisted Feeding Using an LSTM-based Variational Autoencodercited by 209
14 more
- 2020A review on outlier/anomaly detection in time series datacited by 189
- 2020An Empirical Survey of Data Augmentation for Time Series Classification with Neural Networkscited by 128
- 2023DCdetector: Dual Attention Contrastive Representation Learning for Time Series Anomaly Detectioncited by 103
- 2021Towards a Rigorous Evaluation of Time-series Anomaly Detectioncited by 97
- 2018Precision and Recall for Time Seriescited by 67
- 2020Anomaly Detection in Univariate Time-series: A Survey on the State-of-the-Artcited by 56
- 2021Neural Contextual Anomaly Detection for Time Seriescited by 43
- 2023ImDiffusion: Imputed Diffusion Models for Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detectioncited by 40
- 2020TAnoGAN: Time Series Anomaly Detection with Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 29
- 2023AnomalyBERT: Self-Supervised Transformer for Time Series Anomaly Detection using Data Degradation Schemecited by 25
- 2022Deep Generative model with Hierarchical Latent Factors for Time Series Anomaly Detectioncited by 16
- 2020Deep learning for time series classificationcited by 15
- 2022Data Augmentation is a Hyperparameter: Cherry-picked Self-Supervision for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection is Creating the Illusion of Successcited by 11
- 2021Estimating the electrical power output of industrial devices with end-to-end time-series classification in the presence of label noisecited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 6.
7 papers.
- 2026LLM-Assisted Logic Rule Learning: Scaling Human Expertise for Time Series Anomaly Detectioncited by 2
- 2025CAPMix: Robust KPI Anomaly Detection for AIOps in Noisy and Dynamic Environmentscited by 0
- 2026Selective Denoising Diffusion Model for Time Series Anomaly Detectioncited by 0
- 2026IMPACT: Influence Modeling for Open-Set Time Series Anomaly Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Multi-Modal Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 0
- 2026Supervision Recovery for Time Series Anomaly Detection via Context-Anchored Pairingcited by 0
- 2026Generalist Representation, Specialist Detection: TS-Router for Time-Series Anomaly Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Generalist Representation, Specialist Detection: TS-Router for Time-Series Anomaly Detection1 Oct 2026
- 2026Supervision Recovery for Time Series Anomaly Detection via Context-Anchored Pairing27 Sep 2026
- 2026Multi-Modal Anomaly Detection: A Survey24 Aug 2026
- 2026IMPACT: Influence Modeling for Open-Set Time Series Anomaly Detection31 Mar 2026
- 2026Selective Denoising Diffusion Model for Time Series Anomaly Detection27 Feb 2026
- 2026LLM-Assisted Logic Rule Learning: Scaling Human Expertise for Time Series Anomaly Detection27 Jan 2026
- 2025CAPMix: Robust KPI Anomaly Detection for AIOps in Noisy and Dynamic Environments8 Sep 2025