mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Regional Homogeneity: Towards Learning Transferable Universal Adversarial Perturbations Against Defenses

arXiv 1904.00979 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2019cs.CVcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper focuses on learning transferable adversarial examples specifically against defense models (models to defense adversarial attacks). In particular, we show that a simple universal perturbation can fool a series of state-of-the-art defenses. Adversarial examples generated by existing attacks are generally hard to transfer to defense models. We observe the property of regional homogeneity in adversarial perturbations and suggest that the defenses are less robust to regionally homogeneous perturbations. Therefore, we propose an effective transforming paradigm and a customized gradient transformer module to transform existing perturbations into regionally homogeneous ones. Without explicitly forcing the perturbations to be universal, we observe that a well-trained gradient transformer module tends to output input-independent gradients (hence universal) benefiting from the under-fitting phenomenon. Thorough experiments demonstrate that our work significantly outperforms the prior art attacking algorithms (either image-dependent or universal ones) by an average improvement of 14.0% when attacking 9 defenses in the transfer-based attack setting. In addition to the cross-model transferability, we also verify that regionally homogeneous perturbations can well transfer across different vision tasks (attacking with the semantic segmentation task and testing on the object detection task). The code is available here: https://github.com/LiYingwei/Regional-Homogeneity.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 4; 2023: 7; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Advances in adversarial attacks and defenses in computer vision: A surveycited by 127
  2. 2021On Generating Transferable Targeted Perturbationscited by 65
  3. 2021A Survey On Universal Adversarial Attackcited by 59
  4. 2023A Survey on Transferability of Adversarial Examples across Deep Neural Networkscited by 43
  5. 2021Imperceptible Transfer Attack and Defense on 3D Point Cloud Classificationcited by 36
  6. 2021Boosting Transferability of Targeted Adversarial Examples via Hierarchical Generative Networkscited by 31
  7. 2022Investigating Top-k White-Box and Transferable Black-box Attackcited by 26
  8. 2024Adversarial Attacks of Vision Tasks in the Past 10 Years: A Surveycited by 22
  9. 2025One Surrogate to Fool Them All: Universal, Transferable, and Targeted Adversarial Attacks with CLIPcited by 15
  10. 2022Towards Good Practices in Evaluating Transfer Adversarial Attackscited by 14
  11. 2023Reliable Evaluation of Adversarial Transferabilitycited by 12
  12. 2023Improving Adversarial Transferability via Model Alignmentcited by 10
10 more
  1. 2022Practical No-box Adversarial Attacks with Training-free Hybrid Image Transformationcited by 8
  2. 2023SoK: Pitfalls in Evaluating Black-Box Attackscited by 6
  3. 2023A Review of Adversarial Attacks in Computer Visioncited by 5
  4. 2022FG-UAP: Feature-Gathering Universal Adversarial Perturbationcited by 4
  5. 2023Domain Generalization Emerges from Dreamingcited by 1
  6. 2021Resilience of Autonomous Vehicle Object Category Detection to Universal Adversarial Perturbationscited by 0
  7. 2021Adversarial Attacks with Time-Scale Representationscited by 0
  8. 2023On The Relationship Between Universal Adversarial Attacks And Sparse Representationscited by 0
  9. 2024Improving Adversarial Transferability with Neighbourhood Gradient Informationcited by 0
  10. 2026Hierarchical Refinement of Universal Multimodal Attacks on Vision-Language Modelscited by 0