mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MIA-BAD: An Approach for Enhancing Membership Inference Attack and its Mitigation with Federated Learning

arXiv 2312.00051 ↗First posted 28 Nov 2023cs.CR cs.AI cs.LGcited by 7

On the map: LLM safety and security → Federated unlearning and poisoning

Abstract (arXiv)

The membership inference attack (MIA) is a popular paradigm for compromising the privacy of a machine learning (ML) model. MIA exploits the natural inclination of ML models to overfit upon the training data. MIAs are trained to distinguish between training and testing prediction confidence to infer membership information. Federated Learning (FL) is a privacy-preserving ML paradigm that enables multiple clients to train a unified model without disclosing their private data. In this paper, we propose an enhanced Membership Inference Attack with the Batch-wise generated Attack Dataset (MIA-BAD), a modification to the MIA approach. We investigate that the MIA is more accurate when the attack dataset is generated batch-wise. This quantitatively decreases the attack dataset while qualitatively improving it. We show how training an ML model through FL, has some distinct advantages and investigate how the threat introduced with the proposed MIA-BAD approach can be mitigated with FL approaches. Finally, we demonstrate the qualitative effects of the proposed MIA-BAD methodology by conducting extensive experiments with various target datasets, variable numbers of federated clients, and training batch sizes.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Federated unlearning and poisoning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 13 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2023.

Builds on

13 of 28 references.

References · 13

  1. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  3. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  4. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,352
  5. 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 498
  6. 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 459
  7. 2018A Hybrid Approach to Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 210
  8. 2020LDP-FL: Practical Private Aggregation in Federated Learning with Local Differential Privacycited by 64
  9. 2019On Safeguarding Privacy and Security in the Framework of Federated Learningcited by 55
  10. 2021Source Inference Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 34
  11. 2021De-Pois: An Attack-Agnostic Defense against Data Poisoning Attackscited by 33
  12. 2022Federated Learning for Privacy Preservation in Smart Healthcare Systems: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 31
1 more
  1. 2022Anomaly Detection via Federated Learningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Res-MIA: A Training-Free Resolution-Based Membership Inference Attack on Federated Learning Models
  2. 2024FedMIA: An Effective Membership Inference Attack Exploiting "All for One" Principle in Federated Learning
  3. 2026A Full-Pipeline Framework for Evaluating Membership Inference Attacks in Machine Learning
  4. 2026A Critical Review on the Effectiveness and Privacy Threats of Membership Inference Attacks
  5. 2023Source Inference Attacks: Beyond Membership Inference Attacks in Federated Learning
  6. 2025Membership Inference Attacks as Privacy Tools: Reliability, Disparity and Ensemble
  7. 2026United We Defend: Collaborative Membership Inference Defenses in Federated Learning
  8. 2025Evaluating Membership Inference Attacks in heterogeneous-data setups