mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LIMOPro: Reasoning Refinement for Efficient and Effective Test-time Scaling

arXiv 2505.19187 ↗First posted 25 May 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 15

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities through test-time scaling approaches, particularly when fine-tuned with chain-of-thought (CoT) data distilled from more powerful large reasoning models (LRMs). However, these reasoning chains often contain verbose elements that mirror human problem-solving, categorized as progressive reasoning (the essential solution development path) and functional elements (verification processes, alternative solution approaches, and error corrections). While progressive reasoning is crucial, the functional elements significantly increase computational demands during test-time inference. We introduce PIR (Perplexity-based Importance Refinement), a principled framework that quantitatively evaluates the importance of each reasoning step based on its impact on answer prediction confidence. PIR systematically identifies and selectively prunes only low-importance functional steps while preserving progressive reasoning components, creating optimized training data that maintains the integrity of the core solution path while reducing verbosity. Models fine-tuned on PIR-optimized data exhibit superior test-time scaling properties, generating more concise reasoning chains while achieving improved accuracy (+0.9% to +6.6%) with significantly reduced token usage (-3% to -41%) across challenging reasoning benchmarks (AIME, AMC, and GPQA Diamond). Our approach demonstrates strong generalizability across different model sizes, data sources, and token budgets, offering a practical solution for deploying reasoning-capable LLMs in scenarios where efficient test-time scaling, response time, and computational efficiency are valuable constraints.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 24 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2025.

Builds on

24 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Missing Premise exacerbates Overthinking: Are Reasoning Models losing Critical Thinking Skill?9 Apr
  2. 2025DAST: Difficulty-Adaptive Slow-Thinking for Large Reasoning Models6 Mar
  3. 2025TokenSkip: Controllable Chain-of-Thought Compression in LLMs17 Feb
  4. 2025s1: Simple test-time scaling31 Jan
  5. 2025Thoughts Are All Over the Place: On the Underthinking of o1-Like LLMs30 Jan
  6. 2025O1-Pruner: Length-Harmonizing Fine-Tuning for O1-Like Reasoning Pruning22 Jan
  7. 2024Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMs30 Dec
  8. 2024Efficiently Scaling LLM Reasoning with Certaindex30 Dec
  9. 2024Token-Budget-Aware LLM Reasoning24 Dec
  10. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters6 Aug
  11. 2024EAGLE: Speculative Sampling Requires Rethinking Feature Uncertainty26 Jan

Other references · 13

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  4. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  5. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,244
  6. 2025LIMO: Less is More for Reasoningcited by 498
  7. 2025Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRscited by 377
  8. 2025LLMs Can Easily Learn to Reason from Demonstrations Structure, not content, is what matters!cited by 132
  9. 2025Optimizing Test-Time Compute via Meta Reinforcement Fine-Tuningcited by 123
  10. 2024The Good, The Bad, and The Greedy: Evaluation of LLMs Should Not Ignore Non-Determinismcited by 116
  11. 2025Stepwise Perplexity-Guided Refinement for Efficient Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 51
  12. 2024System-1.x: Learning to Balance Fast and Slow Planning with Language Modelscited by 35
1 more
  1. 2024Break the Chain: Large Language Models Can be Shortcut Reasonerscited by 32

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 8.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025The Art of Scaling Test-Time Compute for Large Language Models
  2. 2026Efficient Test-Time Scaling via Temporal Reasoning Aggregation
  3. 2026ThinkRetrieve: Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning Traces for Test-Time Scaling
  4. 2025ARISE: An Adaptive Resolution-Aware Metric for Test-Time Scaling Evaluation in Large Reasoning Models
  5. 2025Scaling over Scaling: Exploring Test-Time Scaling Plateau in Large Reasoning Models
  6. 2026Divergent-Convergent Reasoning: Scaling Test-Time Compute through Structured Solution Synthesis
  7. 2025Prompting Test-Time Scaling Is A Strong LLM Reasoning Data Augmentation
  8. 2026ThinkBooster: A Unified Framework for Seamless Test-Time Scaling of LLM Reasoning