Large Language Models in the Task of Automatic Validation of Text Classifier Predictions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning models for text classification are trained to predict a class for a given text. To do this, training and validation samples must be prepared: a set of texts is collected, and each text is assigned a class. These classes are usually assigned by human annotators with different expertise levels, depending on the specific classification task. Collecting such samples from scratch is labor-intensive because it requires finding specialists and compensating them for their work; moreover, the number of available specialists is limited, and their productivity is constrained by human factors. While it may not be too resource-intensive to collect samples once, the ongoing need to retrain models (especially in incremental learning pipelines) to address data drift (also called model drift) makes the data collection process crucial and costly over the model's entire lifecycle. This paper proposes several approaches to replace human annotators with Large Language Models (LLMs) to test classifier predictions for correctness, helping ensure model quality and support high-quality incremental learning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2025.
Builds on
26 of 42 references.
References · 26
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,073
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 870
- 2023Large Language Modelscited by 780
14 more
- 2020Efficient Intent Detection with Dual Sentence Encoderscited by 433
- 2024A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models: Techniques and Applicationscited by 431
- 2024The Faiss librarycited by 376
- 2024Multilingual E5 Text Embeddings: A Technical Reportcited by 372
- 2023A Comprehensive Capability Analysis of GPT-3 and GPT-3.5 Series Modelscited by 246
- 2020Incremental Learning In Online Scenariocited by 71
- 2024A Survey of Prompt Engineering Methods in Large Language Models for Different NLP Taskscited by 47
- 2024Think Twice Before Trusting: Self-Detection for Large Language Models through Comprehensive Answer Reflectioncited by 41
- 2023Open, Closed, or Small Language Models for Text Classification?cited by 34
- 2024Knowledge Distillation in Automated Annotation: Supervised Text Classification with LLM-Generated Training Labelscited by 25
- 2024Enhancing Text Classification through LLM-Driven Active Learning and Human Annotationcited by 20
- 2024The Russian-focused embedders' exploration: ruMTEB benchmark and Russian embedding model designcited by 20
- 2023Breaking the Bank with ChatGPT: Few-Shot Text Classification for Financecited by 12
- 2025Multi-stage Large Language Model Pipelines Can Outperform GPT-4o in Relevance Assessmentcited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.