Layer-Order Inversion: Rethinking Latent Multi-Hop Reasoning in Large Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) perform well on multi-hop reasoning, yet how they internally compose multiple facts remains unclear. Recent work proposes hop-aligned circuit hypothesis, suggesting that bridge entities are computed sequentially across layers before later-hop answers. Through systematic analyses on real-world multi-hop queries, we show that this hop-aligned assumption does not generalize: later-hop answer entities can become decodable earlier than bridge entities, a phenomenon we call layer-order inversion, which strengthens with total hops. To explain this behavior, we propose a probabilistic recall-and-extract framework that models multi-hop reasoning as broad probabilistic recall in shallow MLP layers followed by selective extraction in deeper attention layers. This framework is empirically validated through systematic probing analyses, reinterpreting prior layer-wise decoding evidence, explaining chain-of-thought gains, and providing a mechanistic diagnosis of multi-hop failures despite correct single-hop knowledge. Code is available at https://github.com/laquabe/Layer-Order-Inversion.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 39 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2026.
Builds on
39 of 45 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Do Large Language Models Perform Latent Multi-Hop Reasoning without Exploiting Shortcuts?25 Nov
- 2024Enhancing Multi-hop Reasoning through Knowledge Erasure in Large Language Model Editing22 Aug
- 2024Making Long-Context Language Models Better Multi-Hop Reasoners6 Aug
- 2024Do Large Language Models Latently Perform Multi-Hop Reasoning?26 Feb
Other references · 35
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,336
- 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,075
- 2022Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformercited by 1,001
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 876
- 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 623
- 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 532
- 2023Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Modelscited by 528
23 more
- 2023MQuAKE: Assessing Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Multi-Hop Questionscited by 300
- 2024Inference Scaling Laws: An Empirical Analysis of Compute-Optimal Inference for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 290
- 2024AlphaEdit: Null-Space Constrained Knowledge Editing for Language Modelscited by 236
- 2024Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Modelscited by 235
- 2024When Scaling Meets LLM Finetuning: The Effect of Data, Model and Finetuning Methodcited by 204
- 2023PMET: Precise Model Editing in a Transformercited by 173
- 2024Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Surveycited by 146
- 2025PlanGenLLMs: A Modern Survey of LLM Planning Capabilitiescited by 83
- 2024Hopping Too Late: Exploring the Limitations of Large Language Models on Multi-Hop Queriescited by 78
- 2024The Benefits of a Concise Chain of Thought on Problem-Solving in Large Language Modelscited by 63
- 2023Towards a Mechanistic Interpretation of Multi-Step Reasoning Capabilities of Language Modelscited by 50
- 2024Understanding and Patching Compositional Reasoning in LLMscited by 46
- 2024Knowledge Graph Enhanced Large Language Model Editingcited by 40
- 2024Locate-then-edit for Multi-hop Factual Recall under Knowledge Editingcited by 37
- 2024Tracing Representation Progression: Analyzing and Enhancing Layer-Wise Similaritycited by 36
- 2021Fine-Tuned Transformers Show Clusters of Similar Representations Across Layerscited by 30
- 2025LogitLens4LLMs: Extending Logit Lens Analysis to Modern Large Language Modelscited by 23
- 2025Language models can learn implicit multi-hop reasoning, but only if they have lots of training datacited by 11
- 2025Mass-Editing Memory with Attention in Transformers: A cross-lingual exploration of knowledgecited by 10
- 2024OneNet: A Fine-Tuning Free Framework for Few-Shot Entity Linking via Large Language Model Promptingcited by 9
- 2025CaKE: Circuit-aware Editing Enables Generalizable Knowledge Learnerscited by 9
- 2024Leveraging Entity Information for Cross-Modality Correlation Learning: The Entity-Guided Multimodal Summarizationcited by 4
- 2025Know3-RAG: A Knowledge-aware RAG Framework with Adaptive Retrieval, Generation, and Filteringcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Towards Interpreting Language Models: A Case Study in Multi-Hop Reasoning
- 2023Memory Injections: Correcting Multi-Hop Reasoning Failures during Inference in Transformer-Based Language Models
- 2026Failure Modes in Multi-Hop QA: The Weakest Link Effect and the Recognition Bottleneck
- 2024Large Language Models Still Face Challenges in Multi-Hop Reasoning with External Knowledge
- 2025Back Attention: Understanding and Enhancing Multi-Hop Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2023Leveraging Structured Information for Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering and Reasoning
- 2024Lessons from Studying Two-Hop Latent Reasoning
- 2026Scaling Reasoning Hop Exposes Weaknesses: Demystifying and Improving Hop Generalization in Large Language Models