mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Spontaneous Speech Variables for Evaluating LLMs Cognitive Plausibility

arXiv 2505.16277 ↗First posted 22 May 2025cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The achievements of Large Language Models in Natural Language Processing, especially for high-resource languages, call for a better understanding of their characteristics from a cognitive perspective. Researchers have attempted to evaluate artificial models by testing their ability to predict behavioral (e.g., eye-tracking fixations) and physiological (e.g., brain responses) variables during language processing (e.g., reading/listening). In this paper, we propose using spontaneous speech corpora to derive production variables (speech reductions, prosodic prominences) and applying them in a similar fashion. More precisely, we extract. We then test models trained with a standard procedure on different pretraining datasets (written, spoken, and mixed genres) for their ability to predict these two variables. Our results show that, after some fine-tuning, the models can predict these production variables well above baselines. We also observe that spoken genre training data provides more accurate predictions than written genres. These results contribute to the broader effort of using high-quality speech corpora as benchmarks for LLMs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2025.

Builds on

26 of 62 references.

References · 26

  1. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
  2. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 958
  3. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 876
  4. 2018Subword Regularization: Improving Neural Network Translation Models with Multiple Subword Candidatescited by 639
  5. 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
  6. 2022Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3cited by 398
  7. 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 320
  8. 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
  9. 2020When Do You Need Billions of Words of Pretraining Data?cited by 104
  10. 2025Findings of the BabyLM Challenge: Sample-Efficient Pretraining on Developmentally Plausible Corporacited by 88
  11. 2023Call for Papers -- The BabyLM Challenge: Sample-efficient pretraining on a developmentally plausible corpuscited by 62
  12. 2021Lower Perplexity is Not Always Human-Likecited by 52
14 more
  1. 2024Findings of the Second BabyLM Challenge: Sample-Efficient Pretraining on Developmentally Plausible Corporacited by 48
  2. 2021CLiMP: A Benchmark for Chinese Language Model Evaluationcited by 46
  3. 2023Analyzing Cognitive Plausibility of Subword Tokenizationcited by 30
  4. 2024Goldfish: Monolingual Language Models for 350 Languagescited by 29
  5. 2023A Better Way to Do Masked Language Model Scoringcited by 27
  6. 2022Neural Language Models are not Born Equal to Fit Brain Data, but Training Helpscited by 26
  7. 2024[Call for Papers] The 2nd BabyLM Challenge: Sample-efficient pretraining on a developmentally plausible corpuscited by 26
  8. 2024RuBLiMP: Russian Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairscited by 24
  9. 2024Is Child-Directed Speech Effective Training Data for Language Models?cited by 24
  10. 2020On the importance of pre-training data volume for compact language modelscited by 21
  11. 2023CLIMB: Curriculum Learning for Infant-inspired Model Buildingcited by 20
  12. 2019Predicting Prosodic Prominence from Text with Pre-trained Contextualized Word Representationscited by 14
  13. 2023Quantifying the redundancy between prosody and textcited by 12
  14. 2023What does BERT learn about prosody?cited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.