mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Think, Prune, Train, Improve: Scaling Reasoning without Scaling Models

arXiv 2504.18116 ↗First posted 25 Apr 2025cs.LGcited by 9

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in programming and mathematical reasoning tasks, but are constrained by limited high-quality training data. Synthetic data can be leveraged to enhance fine-tuning outcomes, but several factors influence this process, including model size, synthetic data volume, pruning strategy, and number of fine-tuning rounds. We explore these axes and investigate which conditions enable model self-improvement. We introduce the Think, Prune, Train process, a scalable framework that iteratively fine-tunes models on their own reasoning traces, using ground-truth pruning to ensure high-quality training data. This approach yields improved performance: on GSM8K, Gemma2-2B achieves a Pass@1 of 57.6% (from 41.9%), Gemma2-9B reaches 82%, matching LLaMA-3.1-70B, and LLaMA-3.1-70B attains 91%, even surpassing GPT-4o, demonstrating the effectiveness of self-generated reasoning and systematic data selection for improving LLM capabilities.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 19 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2025.

Builds on

19 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025s1: Simple test-time scaling31 Jan
  2. 2022STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoning28 Mar

Other references · 17

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  4. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  5. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  6. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  7. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
  8. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
  9. 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,831
  10. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,392
  11. 2024Hybrid LLM: Cost-Efficient and Quality-Aware Query Routingcited by 372
  12. 2023Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 349
5 more
  1. 2024Is Model Collapse Inevitable? Breaking the Curse of Recursion by Accumulating Real and Synthetic Datacited by 151
  2. 2024CodeGemma: Open Code Models Based on Gemmacited by 150
  3. 2024RL on Incorrect Synthetic Data Scales the Efficiency of LLM Math Reasoning by Eight-Foldcited by 99
  4. 2024Unfamiliar Finetuning Examples Control How Language Models Hallucinatecited by 87
  5. 2024Small Language Model Can Self-correctcited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 2.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026From LLMs to LRMs: Rethinking Pruning for Reasoning-Centric Models
  2. 2025Think Before You Prune: Selective Self-Generated Calibration for Pruning Large Reasoning Models
  3. 2026Revisiting the Effectiveness of LLM Pruning for Test-Time Scaling
  4. 2022Large Language Models Can Self-Improve
  5. 2025Self-Training Elicits Concise Reasoning in Large Language Models
  6. 2024Inference Scaling vs Reasoning: An Empirical Analysis of Compute-Optimal LLM Problem-Solving
  7. 2025A Survey of Scaling in Large Language Model Reasoning
  8. 2026Gradually Compacting Large Language Models for Reasoning Like a Boiling Frog