mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reinforcement Learning from User Feedback

arXiv 2505.14946 ↗First posted 20 May 2025cs.AIcited by 8

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in diverse user facing applications, aligning them with real user preferences becomes essential. Existing methods like Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) rely on expert annotators trained on manually defined guidelines, whose judgments may not reflect the priorities of everyday users. We introduce Reinforcement Learning from User Feedback (RLUF), a framework for aligning LLMs directly to implicit signals from users in production. RLUF addresses key challenges of user feedback: user feedback is often binary (e.g., emoji reactions), sparse, and occasionally adversarial. We train a reward model, P[Love], to predict the likelihood that an LLM response will receive a Love Reaction, a lightweight form of positive user feedback, and integrate P[Love] into a multi-objective policy optimization framework alongside helpfulness and safety objectives. In large-scale experiments, we show that P[Love] is predictive of increased positive feedback and serves as a reliable offline evaluator of future user behavior. Policy optimization using P[Love] significantly raises observed positive-feedback rates, including a 28% increase in Love Reactions during live A/B tests. However, optimizing for positive reactions introduces reward hacking challenges, requiring careful balancing of objectives. By directly leveraging implicit signals from users, RLUF offers a path to aligning LLMs with real-world user preferences at scale.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 8 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2025.

Builds on

8 of 12 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024The Perfect Blend: Redefining RLHF with Mixture of Judges30 Sep
  2. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback12 Apr
  3. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences18 Sep

Other references · 5

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  3. 2019Deep Learning Recommendation Model for Personalization and Recommendation Systemscited by 327
  4. 2022Monolith: Real Time Recommendation System With Collisionless Embedding Tablecited by 30
  5. 2023Improving Open Language Models by Learning from Organic Interactionscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: A Statistical Perspective
  2. 2024RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs
  3. 2024Mapping out the Space of Human Feedback for Reinforcement Learning: A Conceptual Framework
  4. 2024Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference Learning
  5. 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback
  6. 2025Language Model Personalization via Reward Factorization
  7. 2024Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part II: Reward Modeling
  8. 2024RLVF: Learning from Verbal Feedback without Overgeneralization