Contrastive Consolidation of Top-Down Modulations Achieves Sparsely Supervised Continual Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Biological brains learn continually from a stream of unlabeled data, while integrating specialized information from sparsely labeled examples without compromising their ability to generalize. Meanwhile, machine learning methods are susceptible to catastrophic forgetting in this natural learning setting, as supervised specialist fine-tuning degrades performance on the original task. We introduce task-modulated contrastive learning (TMCL), which takes inspiration from the biophysical machinery in the neocortex, using predictive coding principles to integrate top-down information continually and without supervision. We follow the idea that these principles build a view-invariant representation space, and that this can be implemented using a contrastive loss. Then, whenever labeled samples of a new class occur, new affine modulations are learned that improve separation of the new class from all others, without affecting feedforward weights. By co-opting the view-invariance learning mechanism, we then train feedforward weights to match the unmodulated representation of a data sample to its modulated counterparts. This introduces modulation invariance into the representation space, and, by also using past modulations, stabilizes it. Our experiments show improvements in both class-incremental and transfer learning over state-of-the-art unsupervised approaches, as well as over comparable supervised approaches, using as few as 1% of available labels. Taken together, our work suggests that top-down modulations play a crucial role in balancing stability and plasticity.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 72 of its 130 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2025.
Builds on
72 of 130 references.
References · 72
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
38 more
- 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,333
- 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,333
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,898
- 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
- 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
- 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
- 2018Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 1,330
- 2019Contrastive Multiview Codingcited by 1,301
- 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,245
- 2017Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replaycited by 1,158
- 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,105
- 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,095
- 2018Efficient Lifelong Learning with A-GEMcited by 1,058
- 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
- 2020Dark Experience for General Continual Learning: a Strong, Simple Baselinecited by 911
- 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 896
- 2018Riemannian Walk for Incremental Learning: Understanding Forgetting and Intransigencecited by 742
- 2019Large Scale Incremental Learningcited by 732
- 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 719
- 2018Overcoming catastrophic forgetting with hard attention to the taskcited by 681
- 2018Taskonomy: Disentangling Task Transfer Learningcited by 634
- 2018End-to-End Incremental Learningcited by 597
- 2017Learning multiple visual domains with residual adapterscited by 557
- 2021ConViT: Improving Vision Transformers with Soft Convolutional Inductive Biasescited by 484
- 2022Scaling & Shifting Your Features: A New Baseline for Efficient Model Tuningcited by 294
- 2021DyTox: Transformers for Continual Learning with DYnamic TOken eXpansioncited by 291
- 2019Maintaining Discrimination and Fairness in Class Incremental Learningcited by 283
- 2021Co2L: Contrastive Continual Learningcited by 244
- 2019Kornia: an Open Source Differentiable Computer Vision Library for PyTorchcited by 232
- 2020Supermasks in Superpositioncited by 227
- 2022Patching open-vocabulary models by interpolating weightscited by 190
- 2019Learning to Remember: A Synaptic Plasticity Driven Framework for Continual Learningcited by 182
- 2021Self-Supervised Models are Continual Learnerscited by 149
- 2019Continual Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 147
- 2022Learning Fast, Learning Slow: A General Continual Learning Method based on Complementary Learning Systemcited by 112
- 2018Alleviating catastrophic forgetting using context-dependent gating and synaptic stabilizationcited by 104
- 2020Training BatchNorm and Only BatchNorm: On the Expressive Power of Random Features in CNNscited by 104
50 most cited of 72 All 72 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.