mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The role of data partitioning on the performance of EEG-based deep learning models in supervised cross-subject analysis: a preliminary study

arXiv 2505.13021 ↗First posted 19 May 2025eess.SP cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning is significantly advancing the analysis of electroencephalography (EEG) data by effectively discovering highly nonlinear patterns within the signals. Data partitioning and cross-validation are crucial for assessing model performance and ensuring study comparability, as they can produce varied results and data leakage due to specific signal properties (e.g., biometric). Such variability leads to incomparable studies and, increasingly, overestimated performance claims, which are detrimental to the field. Nevertheless, no comprehensive guidelines for proper data partitioning and cross-validation exist in the domain, nor is there a quantitative evaluation of their impact on model accuracy, reliability, and generalizability. To assist researchers in identifying optimal experimental strategies, this paper thoroughly investigates the role of data partitioning and cross-validation in evaluating EEG deep learning models. Five cross-validation settings are compared across three supervised cross-subject classification tasks (BCI, Parkinson's, and Alzheimer's disease detection) and four established architectures of increasing complexity (ShallowConvNet, EEGNet, DeepConvNet, and Temporal-based ResNet). The comparison of over 100,000 trained models underscores, first, the importance of using subject-based cross-validation strategies for evaluating EEG deep learning models, except when within-subject analyses are acceptable (e.g., BCI). Second, it highlights the greater reliability of nested approaches (N-LNSO) compared to non-nested counterparts, which are prone to data leakage and favor larger models overfitting to validation data. In conclusion, this work provides EEG deep learning researchers with an analysis of data partitioning and cross-validation and offers guidelines to avoid data leakage, currently undermining the domain with potentially overestimated performance claims.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.

Builds on

16 of 58 references.

References · 16

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2016EEGNet: A Compact Convolutional Network for EEG-based Brain-Computer Interfacescited by 616
  3. 2019Deep learning-based electroencephalography analysis: a systematic reviewcited by 155
  4. 2020Metrics for Multi-Class Classification: an Overviewcited by 140
  5. 2021TorchAudio: Building Blocks for Audio and Speech Processingcited by 83
  6. 2020Subject-Aware Contrastive Learning for Biosignalscited by 75
  7. 2021Model Complexity of Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 64
  8. 2019ICLabel: An automated electroencephalographic independent component classifier, dataset, and websitecited by 46
  9. 2020Machine Learning for Predicting Epileptic Seizures Using EEG Signals: A Reviewcited by 32
  10. 2021Self-supervised Contrastive Learning for EEG-based Sleep Stagingcited by 27
  11. 2022Task-oriented Self-supervised Learning for Anomaly Detection in Electroencephalographycited by 11
  12. 2022Motor Imagery Decoding Using Ensemble Curriculum Learning and Collaborative Trainingcited by 5
4 more
  1. 2023SelfEEG: A Python library for Self-Supervised Learning in Electroencephalographycited by 5
  2. 2024The more, the better? Evaluating the role of EEG preprocessing for deep learning applicationscited by 4
  3. 2023Deep comparisons of Neural Networks from the EEGNet familycited by 3
  4. 2022MP-SeizNet: A Multi-Path CNN Bi-LSTM Network for Seizure-Type Classification Using EEGcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.