mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ConsistencyChecker: Tree-based Evaluation of LLM Generalization Capabilities

arXiv 2506.12376 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2025cs.AI cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating consistency in large language models (LLMs) is crucial for ensuring reliability, particularly in complex, multi-step interactions between humans and LLMs. Traditional self-consistency methods often miss subtle semantic changes in natural language and functional shifts in code or equations, which can accumulate over multiple transformations. To address this, we propose ConsistencyChecker, a tree-based evaluation framework designed to measure consistency through sequences of reversible transformations, including machine translation tasks and AI-assisted programming tasks. In our framework, nodes represent distinct text states, while edges correspond to pairs of inverse operations. Dynamic and LLM-generated benchmarks ensure a fair assessment of the model's generalization ability and eliminate benchmark leakage. Consistency is quantified based on similarity across different depths of the transformation tree. Experiments on eight models from various families and sizes show that ConsistencyChecker can distinguish the performance of different models. Notably, our consistency scores-computed entirely without using WMT paired data-correlate strongly (r > 0.7) with WMT 2024 auto-ranking, demonstrating the validity of our benchmark-free approach. Our implementation is available at: https://github.com/ulab-uiuc/consistencychecker.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2025.

Builds on

15 of 32 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  4. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  5. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  6. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
  7. 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,917
  8. 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 902
  9. 2021CodeXGLUE: A Machine Learning Benchmark Dataset for Code Understanding and Generationcited by 744
  10. 2024A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 658
  11. 2023Scaling up COMETKIWI: Unbabel-IST 2023 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 88
  12. 2024Latent Space Chain-of-Embedding Enables Output-free LLM Self-Evaluationcited by 57
3 more
  1. 2025LessLeak-Bench: A First Investigation of Data Leakage in LLMs Across 83 Software Engineering Benchmarkscited by 37
  2. 2023Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating Self-Consistency of Code Large Language Models with IdentityChaincited by 31
  3. 2024Preliminary WMT24 Ranking of General MT Systems and LLMscited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Evaluating the Consistency of LLM Evaluators
  2. 2025Existing LLMs Are Not Self-Consistent For Simple Tasks
  3. 2023Self-Consistency of Large Language Models under Ambiguity
  4. 2023Let's Sample Step by Step: Adaptive-Consistency for Efficient Reasoning and Coding with LLMs
  5. 2024Evaluating Consistency and Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models
  6. 2024Are Your LLMs Capable of Stable Reasoning?
  7. 2024Improving the Robustness of Large Language Models via Consistency Alignment
  8. 2026Position: It's Time to Optimize LLMs for Self-Consistency