Multi-Level Aware Preference Learning: Enhancing RLHF for Complex Multi-Instruction Tasks
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
RLHF has emerged as a predominant approach for aligning artificial intelligence systems with human preferences, demonstrating exceptional and measurable efficacy in instruction following tasks; however, it exhibits insufficient compliance capabilities when confronted with complex multi-instruction tasks. Conventional approaches rely heavily on human annotation or more sophisticated large language models, thereby introducing substantial resource expenditure or potential bias concerns. Meanwhile, alternative synthetic methods that augment standard preference datasets often compromise the model's semantic quality. Our research identifies a critical oversight in existing techniques, which predominantly focus on comparing responses while neglecting valuable latent signals embedded within prompt inputs, and which only focus on preference disparities at the intra-sample level, while neglecting to account for the inter-sample level preference differentials that exist among preference data. To leverage these previously neglected indicators, we propose a novel Multi-level Aware Preference Learning (MAPL) framework, capable of enhancing multi-instruction capabilities. Specifically, for any given response in original preference data pairs, we construct varied prompts with a preference relation under different conditions, in order to learn intra-sample level preference disparities. Furthermore, for any given original preference pair, we synthesize multi-instruction preference pairs to capture preference discrepancies at the inter-sample level. Building on the two datasets constructed above, we consequently devise two sophisticated training objective functions. Subsequently, our framework integrates seamlessly into both Reward Modeling and Direct Preference Optimization paradigms. Through rigorous evaluation across multiple benchmarks, we empirically validate the efficacy of our framework.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 30 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.
Builds on
30 of 39 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Self-play with Execution Feedback: Improving Instruction-following Capabilities of Large Language Models19 Jun
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
- 2024Noise Contrastive Alignment of Language Models with Explicit Rewards8 Feb
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
- 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignment14 Apr
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
Other references · 24
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
- 2023Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World Modelcited by 846
- 2023WizardMath: Empowering Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models via Reinforced Evol-Instructcited by 618
- 2022DeepSpeed Inference: Enabling Efficient Inference of Transformer Models at Unprecedented Scalecited by 403
12 more
- 2023MathPrompter: Mathematical Reasoning using Large Language Modelscited by 236
- 2023Large Language Models as Commonsense Knowledge for Large-Scale Task Planningcited by 231
- 2022Synchromesh: Reliable code generation from pre-trained language modelscited by 156
- 2024Improving Instruction-Following in Language Models through Activation Steeringcited by 149
- 2023Self-planning Code Generation with Large Language Modelscited by 121
- 2023DeepSpeed-Chat: Easy, Fast and Affordable RLHF Training of ChatGPT-like Models at All Scalescited by 107
- 2023Can Large Language Models Understand Real-World Complex Instructions?cited by 69
- 2023The Wisdom of Hindsight Makes Language Models Better Instruction Followerscited by 59
- 2023Large Language Model Instruction Following: A Survey of Progresses and Challengescited by 31
- 2024From Complex to Simple: Enhancing Multi-Constraint Complex Instruction Following Ability of Large Language Modelscited by 27
- 2023SuperHF: Supervised Iterative Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 10
- 2025Disentangling Length Bias In Preference Learning Via Response-Conditioned Modelingcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024A Systematic Examination of Preference Learning through the Lens of Instruction-Following
- 2026Instruction Quality Matters: Refining Instructions for Effective Preference Learning
- 2025AIR: A Systematic Analysis of Annotations, Instructions, and Response Pairs in Preference Dataset
- 2024Data-Centric Human Preference with Rationales for Direct Preference Alignment
- 2024ICPL: Few-shot In-context Preference Learning via LLMs
- 2024Towards Data-Centric RLHF: Simple Metrics for Preference Dataset Comparison
- 2023Safer-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Automated Preference Data
- 2024A Survey on Human Preference Learning for Large Language Models