Automated Generation of Curriculum-Aligned Multiple-Choice Questions for Malaysian Secondary Mathematics Using Generative AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper addresses the critical need for scalable and high-quality educational assessment tools within the Malaysian education system. It highlights the potential of Generative AI (GenAI) while acknowledging the significant challenges of ensuring factual accuracy and curriculum alignment, especially for low-resource languages like Bahasa Melayu. This research introduces and compares four incremental pipelines for generating Form 1 Mathematics multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in Bahasa Melayu using OpenAI's GPT-4o. The methods range from non-grounded prompting (structured and basic) to Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) approaches (one using the LangChain framework, one implemented manually). The system is grounded in official curriculum documents, including teacher-prepared notes and the yearly teaching plan (RPT). A dual-pronged automated evaluation framework is employed to assess the generated questions. Curriculum alignment is measured using Semantic Textual Similarity (STS) against the RPT, while contextual validity is verified through a novel RAG-based Question-Answering (RAG-QA) method. The results demonstrate that RAG-based pipelines significantly outperform non-grounded prompting methods, producing questions with higher curriculum alignment and factual validity. The study further analyzes the trade-offs between the ease of implementation of framework-based RAG and the fine-grained control offered by a manual pipeline. This work presents a validated methodology for generating curriculum-specific educational content in a low-resource language, introduces a symbiotic RAG-QA evaluation technique, and provides actionable insights for the development and deployment of practical EdTech solutions in Malaysia and similar regions.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2025.
Builds on
9 of 25 references.
References · 9
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
- 2025Savaal: Scalable Concept-Driven Question Generation to Enhance Human Learningcited by 7
- 2025Generative AI and Large Language Models in Language Preservation: Opportunities and Challengescited by 2
- 2024Application of Large Language Models in Automated Question Generation: A Case Study on ChatGLM's Structured Questions for National Teacher Certification Examscited by 1
- 2024Leveraging Large Language Models to Generate Course-specific Semantically Annotated Learning Objectscited by 1
- 2025Automatic Teaching Platform on Vision Language Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 1
- 2025Machine Assistant with Reliable Knowledge: Enhancing Student Learning via RAG-based Retrievalcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Exploring the Capabilities of Prompted Large Language Models in Educational and Assessment Applications
- 2023Retrieval-augmented Generation to Improve Math Question-Answering: Trade-offs Between Groundedness and Human Preference
- 2024The Future of Learning in the Age of Generative AI: Automated Question Generation and Assessment with Large Language Models
- 2024Generating AI Literacy MCQs: A Multi-Agent LLM Approach
- 2025Aligning LLMs for the Classroom with Knowledge-Based Retrieval -- A Comparative RAG Study
- 2025EduAgentQG: Multi-Agent Personalized Mathematics Question Generation with Explicit Diversity and Objective-Aware Evaluation
- 2026Gurukul AI: An Interactive AI-Driven Educational Platform for Indian Education System
- 2025Automatic Large Language Models Creation of Interactive Learning Lessons