PLHF: Prompt Optimization with Few-Shot Human Feedback
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Automatic prompt optimization frameworks are developed to obtain suitable prompts for large language models (LLMs) with respect to desired output quality metrics. Although existing approaches can handle conventional tasks such as fixed-solution question answering, defining the metric becomes complicated when the output quality cannot be easily assessed by comparisons with standard golden samples. Consequently, optimizing the prompts effectively and efficiently without a clear metric becomes a critical challenge. To address the issue, we present PLHF (which stands for "P"rompt "L"earning with "H"uman "F"eedback), a few-shot prompt optimization framework inspired by the well-known RLHF technique. Different from naive strategies, PLHF employs a specific evaluator module acting as the metric to estimate the output quality. PLHF requires only a single round of human feedback to complete the entire prompt optimization process. Empirical results on both public and industrial datasets show that PLHF outperforms prior output grading strategies for LLM prompt optimizations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 19 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2025.
Builds on
19 of 36 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 18
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
- 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,256
- 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,075
- 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,045
- 2023Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Searchcited by 653
- 2022Decomposed Prompting: A Modular Approach for Solving Complex Taskscited by 558
- 2023Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolutioncited by 551
- 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 422
- 2022RLPrompt: Optimizing Discrete Text Prompts with Reinforcement Learningcited by 366
6 more
- 2023Hard Prompts Made Easy: Gradient-Based Discrete Optimization for Prompt Tuning and Discoverycited by 336
- 2018The Natural Language Decathlon: Multitask Learning as Question Answeringcited by 236
- 2023Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback: Learning Dynamic Choices via Pessimismcited by 69
- 2021Simulating User Satisfaction for the Evaluation of Task-oriented Dialogue Systemscited by 47
- 2022No More Fine-Tuning? An Experimental Evaluation of Prompt Tuning in Code Intelligencecited by 41
- 2024Fine-tuning Large Language Model (LLM) Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Ophthalmology and LLM-based evaluation using GPT-4cited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Prompt Optimization with Human Feedback
- 2024PRompt Optimization in Multi-Step Tasks (PROMST): Integrating Human Feedback and Heuristic-based Sampling
- 2025SIPDO: Closed-Loop Prompt Optimization via Synthetic Data Feedback
- 2024Towards Hierarchical Multi-Agent Workflows for Zero-Shot Prompt Optimization
- 2025Rethinking Prompt Optimizers: From Prompt Merits to Optimization
- 2024Putting People in LLMs' Shoes: Generating Better Answers via Question Rewriter
- 2025Self-Supervised Prompt Optimization
- 2026Optimizing LLM Prompt Engineering with DSPy Based Declarative Learning