mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Hierarchical Multi-Agent Workflows for Zero-Shot Prompt Optimization

arXiv 2405.20252 ↗First posted 30 May 2024cs.CLcited by 10

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have shown great progress in responding to user questions, allowing for a multitude of diverse applications. Yet, the quality of LLM outputs heavily depends on the prompt design, where a good prompt might enable the LLM to answer a very challenging question correctly. Therefore, recent works have developed many strategies for improving the prompt, including both manual crafting and in-domain optimization. However, their efficacy in unrestricted scenarios remains questionable, as the former depends on human design for specific questions and the latter usually generalizes poorly to unseen scenarios. To address these problems, we give LLMs the freedom to design the best prompts according to themselves. Specifically, we include a hierarchy of LLMs, first constructing a prompt with precise instructions and accurate wording in a hierarchical manner, and then using this prompt to generate the final answer to the user query. We term this pipeline Hierarchical Multi-Agent Workflow, or HMAW. In contrast with prior works, HMAW imposes no human restriction and requires no training, and is completely task-agnostic while capable of adjusting to the nuances of the underlying task. Through both quantitative and qualitative experiments across multiple benchmarks, we verify that despite its simplicity, the proposed approach can create detailed and suitable prompts, further boosting the performance of current LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 29 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2024.

Builds on

29 of 32 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Unleashing the Emergent Cognitive Synergy in Large Language Models: A Task-Solving Agent through Multi-Persona Self-Collaboration11 Jul

Other references · 28

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  4. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  5. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  6. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  7. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  8. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
  9. 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,823
  10. 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,045
  11. 2023Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Modelscited by 886
  12. 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 864
16 more
  1. 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquingcited by 783
  2. 2023Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectorscited by 486
  3. 2022Generating Sequences by Learning to Self-Correctcited by 277
  4. 2023PromptAgent: Strategic Planning with Language Models Enables Expert-level Prompt Optimizationcited by 233
  5. 2021CodeNet: A Large-Scale AI for Code Dataset for Learning a Diversity of Coding Taskscited by 200
  6. 2023ExpertPrompting: Instructing Large Language Models to be Distinguished Expertscited by 142
  7. 2020Unsupervised Evaluation of Interactive Dialog with DialoGPTcited by 139
  8. 2023Rephrase and Respond: Let Large Language Models Ask Better Questions for Themselvescited by 123
  9. 2024Meta-Prompting: Enhancing Language Models with Task-Agnostic Scaffoldingcited by 117
  10. 2023Guiding Large Language Models via Directional Stimulus Promptingcited by 95
  11. 2023Synthetic Prompting: Generating Chain-of-Thought Demonstrations for Large Language Modelscited by 61
  12. 2024DoraemonGPT: Toward Understanding Dynamic Scenes with Large Language Models (Exemplified as A Video Agent)cited by 58
  13. 2023Principled Instructions Are All You Need for Questioning LLaMA-1/2, GPT-3.5/4cited by 48
  14. 2023Query-Dependent Prompt Evaluation and Optimization with Offline Inverse RLcited by 37
  15. 2023Primacy Effect of ChatGPTcited by 27
  16. 2023On Meta-Promptingcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 9; 2026: 1.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Helix: A Dual-Helix Co-Evolutionary Multi-Agent System for Prompt Optimization and Question Reformulation
  2. 2026Enhancing LLM Instruction Following: An Evaluation-Driven Multi-Agentic Workflow for Prompt Instructions Optimization
  3. 2024PRompt Optimization in Multi-Step Tasks (PROMST): Integrating Human Feedback and Heuristic-based Sampling
  4. 2026Asking Questions the Right Way: A Multi-Agent Conversational System for Prompt Formulation in Complex Task Resolution
  5. 2025AutoPDL: Automatic Prompt Optimization for LLM Agents
  6. 2026A Tri-Agent Framework for Evaluating and Aligning Question Clarification Capabilities of Large Language Models
  7. 2025PLHF: Prompt Optimization with Few-Shot Human Feedback
  8. 2024RePrompt: Planning by Automatic Prompt Engineering for Large Language Models Agents