mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

COMRECGC: Global Graph Counterfactual Explainer through Common Recourse

arXiv 2505.07081 ↗First posted 11 May 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph neural networks (GNNs) have been widely used in various domains such as social networks, molecular biology, or recommendation systems. Concurrently, different explanations methods of GNNs have arisen to complement its black-box nature. Explanations of the GNNs' predictions can be categorized into two types--factual and counterfactual. Given a GNN trained on binary classification into ''accept'' and ''reject'' classes, a global counterfactual explanation consists in generating a small set of ''accept'' graphs relevant to all of the input ''reject'' graphs. The transformation of a ''reject'' graph into an ''accept'' graph is called a recourse. A common recourse explanation is a small set of recourse, from which every ''reject'' graph can be turned into an ''accept'' graph. Although local counterfactual explanations have been studied extensively, the problem of finding common recourse for global counterfactual explanation remains unexplored, particularly for GNNs. In this paper, we formalize the common recourse explanation problem, and design an effective algorithm, COMRECGC, to solve it. We benchmark our algorithm against strong baselines on four different real-world graphs datasets and demonstrate the superior performance of COMRECGC against the competitors. We also compare the common recourse explanations to the graph counterfactual explanation, showing that common recourse explanations are either comparable or superior, making them worth considering for applications such as drug discovery or computational biology.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2025.

Builds on

23 of 51 references.

References · 23

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  4. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  5. 2019GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 737
  6. 2020Algorithmic Recourse: from Counterfactual Explanations to Interventionscited by 250
  7. 2020PGM-Explainer: Probabilistic Graphical Model Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 211
  8. 2021CF-GNNExplainer: Counterfactual Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 119
  9. 2020Chip Placement with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 83
  10. 2022Learning and Evaluating Graph Neural Network Explanations based on Counterfactual and Factual Reasoningcited by 79
  11. 2021Robust Counterfactual Explanations on Graph Neural Networkscited by 72
  12. 2021Counterfactual Graphs for Explainable Classification of Brain Networkscited by 33
11 more
  1. 2022Global Counterfactual Explainer for Graph Neural Networkscited by 30
  2. 2023GLOBE-CE: A Translation-Based Approach for Global Counterfactual Explanationscited by 27
  3. 2022Learning Articulated Rigid Body Dynamics with Lagrangian Graph Neural Networkcited by 23
  4. 2023GNNX-BENCH: Unravelling the Utility of Perturbation-based GNN Explainers through In-depth Benchmarkingcited by 11
  5. 2023Beyond Known Reality: Exploiting Counterfactual Explanations for Medical Researchcited by 9
  6. 2020Weakly Submodular Function Maximization Using Local Submodularity Ratiocited by 7
  7. 2019Tight Approximation Bounds for Maximum Multi-Coveragecited by 5
  8. 2024Generating Robust Counterfactual Witnesses for Graph Neural Networkscited by 4
  9. 2023Counterfactual Explanations for Graph Classification Through the Lenses of Densitycited by 2
  10. 2024Game-theoretic Counterfactual Explanation for Graph Neural Networkscited by 2
  11. 2020Approximation algorithm for the Multicovering Problemcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.