Balancing Client Participation in Federated Learning Using AoI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) offers a decentralized framework that preserves data privacy while enabling collaborative model training across distributed clients. However, FL faces significant challenges due to limited communication resources, statistical heterogeneity, and the need for balanced client participation. This paper proposes an Age of Information (AoI)-based client selection policy that addresses these challenges by minimizing load imbalance through controlled selection intervals. Our method employs a decentralized Markov scheduling policy, allowing clients to independently manage participation based on age-dependent selection probabilities, which balances client updates across training rounds with minimal central oversight. We provide a convergence proof for our method, demonstrating that it ensures stable and efficient model convergence. Specifically, we derive optimal parameters for the Markov selection model to achieve balanced and consistent client participation, highlighting the benefits of AoI in enhancing convergence stability. Through extensive simulations, we demonstrate that our AoI-based method, particularly the optimal Markov variant, improves convergence over the FedAvg selection approach across both IID and non-IID data settings by 7.5% and up to 20%. Our findings underscore the effectiveness of AoI-based scheduling for scalable, fair, and efficient FL systems across diverse learning environments.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2025.
Builds on
17 of 28 references.
References · 17
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
- 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,229
- 2020Client Selection in Federated Learning: Convergence Analysis and Power-of-Choice Selection Strategiescited by 198
- 2022FedDC: Federated Learning with Non-IID Data via Local Drift Decoupling and Correctioncited by 181
- 2021Clustered Sampling: Low-Variance and Improved Representativity for Clients Selection in Federated Learningcited by 93
- 2020Age of Information: An Introduction and Surveycited by 70
- 2019Active Federated Learningcited by 63
- 2019Age-Based Scheduling Policy for Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networkscited by 39
- 2023FedASMU: Efficient Asynchronous Federated Learning with Dynamic Staleness-aware Model Updatecited by 32
- 2022Convergence Acceleration in Wireless Federated Learning: A Stackelberg Game Approachcited by 10
5 more
- 2021A General Theory for Client Sampling in Federated Learningcited by 8
- 2023Joint Age-based Client Selection and Resource Allocation for Communication-Efficient Federated Learning over NOMA Networkscited by 8
- 2021FedNS: Improving Federated Learning for collaborative image classification on mobile clientscited by 3
- 2024Scalable and Reliable Over-the-Air Federated Edge Learningcited by 1
- 2024Load Balancing in Federated Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.