Harnessing Structured Knowledge: A Concept Map-Based Approach for High-Quality Multiple Choice Question Generation with Effective Distractors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generating high-quality MCQs, especially those targeting diverse cognitive levels and incorporating common misconceptions into distractor design, is time-consuming and expertise-intensive, making manual creation impractical at scale. Current automated approaches typically generate questions at lower cognitive levels and fail to incorporate domain-specific misconceptions. This paper presents a hierarchical concept map-based framework that provides structured knowledge to guide LLMs in generating MCQs with distractors. We chose high-school physics as our test domain and began by developing a hierarchical concept map covering major Physics topics and their interconnections with an efficient database design. Next, through an automated pipeline, topic-relevant sections of these concept maps are retrieved to serve as a structured context for the LLM to generate questions and distractors that specifically target common misconceptions. Lastly, an automated validation is completed to ensure that the generated MCQs meet the requirements provided. We evaluate our framework against two baseline approaches: a base LLM and a RAG-based generation. We conducted expert evaluations and student assessments of the generated MCQs. Expert evaluation shows that our method significantly outperforms the baseline approaches, achieving a success rate of 75.20% in meeting all quality criteria compared to approximately 37% for both baseline methods. Student assessment data reveal that our concept map-driven approach achieved a significantly lower guess success rate of 28.05% compared to 37.10% for the baselines, indicating a more effective assessment of conceptual understanding. The results demonstrate that our concept map-based approach enables robust assessment across cognitive levels and instant identification of conceptual gaps, facilitating faster feedback loops and targeted interventions at scale.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2025.
Builds on
29 of 47 references.
References · 29
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
17 more
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
- 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,583
- 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 981
- 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 765
- 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 698
- 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 639
- 2018SWAG: A Large-Scale Adversarial Dataset for Grounded Commonsense Inferencecited by 333
- 2016Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine Comprehensioncited by 278
- 2023A Comparative Study of AI-Generated (GPT-4) and Human-crafted MCQs in Programming Educationcited by 35
- 2015A Hierarchical Neural Autoencoder for Paragraphs and Documentscited by 26
- 2024Distractor Generation in Multiple-Choice Tasks: A Survey of Methods, Datasets, and Evaluationcited by 25
- 2018Generating Distractors for Reading Comprehension Questions from Real Examinationscited by 24
- 2023Automated Distractor and Feedback Generation for Math Multiple-choice Questions via In-context Learningcited by 24
- 2024A Novel Multi-Stage Prompting Approach for Language Agnostic MCQ Generation using GPTcited by 19
- 2019Co-Attention Hierarchical Network: Generating Coherent Long Distractors for Reading Comprehensioncited by 14
- 2022EduQG: A Multi-format Multiple Choice Dataset for the Educational Domaincited by 11
- 2024Does Multiple Choice Have a Future in the Age of Generative AI? A Posttest-only RCTcited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026KNIGHT: Knowledge Graph-Driven Multiple-Choice Question Generation with Adaptive Hardness Calibration
- 2025Beyond the Textual: Generating Coherent Visual Options for MCQs
- 2025Tailoring Diagnostic Modeling to Individual Learners: Personalized Distractor Generation via MCTS-Guided Reasoning Reconstruction
- 2026Can LLMs Model Incorrect Student Reasoning? A Case Study on Distractor Generation
- 2026Cognitively Diverse Multiple-Choice Question Generation: A Hybrid Multi-Agent Framework with Large Language Models
- 2026From Memorization to Creation: Evaluating the Cognitive Depth of LLM-Generated Educational Questions
- 2024Leveraging Large Language Models to Generate Course-specific Semantically Annotated Learning Objects
- 2025Generating Plausible Distractors for Multiple-Choice Questions via Student Choice Prediction