mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Advancing Constrained Monotonic Neural Networks: Achieving Universal Approximation Beyond Bounded Activations

arXiv 2505.02537 ↗First posted 5 May 2025cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Conventional techniques for imposing monotonicity in MLPs by construction involve the use of non-negative weight constraints and bounded activation functions, which pose well-known optimization challenges. In this work, we generalize previous theoretical results, showing that MLPs with non-negative weight constraint and activations that saturate on alternating sides are universal approximators for monotonic functions. Additionally, we show an equivalence between the saturation side in the activations and the sign of the weight constraint. This connection allows us to prove that MLPs with convex monotone activations and non-positive constrained weights also qualify as universal approximators, in contrast to their non-negative constrained counterparts. Our results provide theoretical grounding to the empirical effectiveness observed in previous works while leading to possible architectural simplification. Moreover, to further alleviate the optimization difficulties, we propose an alternative formulation that allows the network to adjust its activations according to the sign of the weights. This eliminates the requirement for weight reparameterization, easing initialization and improving training stability. Experimental evaluation reinforces the validity of the theoretical results, showing that our novel approach compares favourably to traditional monotonic architectures.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2025.

Builds on

25 of 43 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  5. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  6. 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,070
  7. 2017Self-Normalizing Neural Networkscited by 598
  8. 2018Why ReLU networks yield high-confidence predictions far away from the training data and how to mitigate the problemcited by 323
  9. 2016On the Expressive Power of Deep Neural Networkscited by 306
  10. 2013Maxout Networkscited by 187
  11. 2021Activation Functions in Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey and Benchmarkcited by 155
  12. 2019Fully Neural Network based Model for General Temporal Point Processescited by 122
13 more
  1. 2019Unconstrained Monotonic Neural Networkscited by 92
  2. 2017Continuously Differentiable Exponential Linear Unitscited by 73
  3. 2017Deep Lattice Networks and Partial Monotonic Functionscited by 63
  4. 2015Monotonic Calibrated Interpolated Look-Up Tablescited by 35
  5. 2020Counterexample-Guided Learning of Monotonic Neural Networkscited by 34
  6. 2015Deep Learning with S-shaped Rectified Linear Activation Unitscited by 26
  7. 2018Neural Likelihoods via Cumulative Distribution Functionscited by 25
  8. 2019How to Incorporate Monotonicity in Deep Networks While Preserving Flexibility?cited by 21
  9. 2020Review and Comparison of Commonly Used Activation Functions for Deep Neural Networkscited by 21
  10. 2023Neural Fine-Gray: Monotonic neural networks for competing riskscited by 20
  11. 2022Size and depth of monotone neural networks: interpolation and approximationcited by 10
  12. 2023Expressive Monotonic Neural Networkscited by 7
  13. 2019MonoNet: Towards Interpretable Models by Learning Monotonic Featurescited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.

8 papers.