mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Neural Fine-Gray: Monotonic neural networks for competing risks

arXiv 2305.06703 ↗First posted 11 May 2023cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Time-to-event modelling, known as survival analysis, differs from standard regression as it addresses censoring in patients who do not experience the event of interest. Despite competitive performances in tackling this problem, machine learning methods often ignore other competing risks that preclude the event of interest. This practice biases the survival estimation. Extensions to address this challenge often rely on parametric assumptions or numerical estimations leading to sub-optimal survival approximations. This paper leverages constrained monotonic neural networks to model each competing survival distribution. This modelling choice ensures the exact likelihood maximisation at a reduced computational cost by using automatic differentiation. The effectiveness of the solution is demonstrated on one synthetic and three medical datasets. Finally, we discuss the implications of considering competing risks when developing risk scores for medical practice.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2023.

Builds on

12 of 57 references.

References · 12

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2016DeepSurv: Personalized Treatment Recommender System Using A Cox Proportional Hazards Deep Neural Networkcited by 358
  3. 2019Intensity-Free Learning of Temporal Point Processescited by 140
  4. 2019Fully Neural Network based Model for General Temporal Point Processescited by 122
  5. 2017Machine Learning for Survival Analysis: A Surveycited by 112
  6. 2020Deep Survival Machines: Fully Parametric Survival Regression and Representation Learning for Censored Data with Competing Riskscited by 70
  7. 2021Deep Cox Mixtures for Survival Regressioncited by 44
  8. 2021Survival Regression with Proper Scoring Rules and Monotonic Neural Networkscited by 42
  9. 2018Neural Likelihoods via Cumulative Distribution Functionscited by 25
  10. 2022auton-survival: an Open-Source Package for Regression, Counterfactual Estimation, Evaluation and Phenotyping with Censored Time-to-Event Datacited by 17
  11. 2022Counterfactual Phenotyping with Censored Time-to-Eventscited by 13
  12. 2022A review on competing risks methods for survival analysiscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 10; 2026: 4.

20 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2024An Introduction to Deep Survival Analysis Models for Predicting Time-to-Event Outcomescited by 16
  2. 2025Advancing Constrained Monotonic Neural Networks: Achieving Universal Approximation Beyond Bounded Activationscited by 8
  3. 2024HACSurv: A Hierarchical Copula-Based Approach for Survival Analysis with Dependent Competing Riskscited by 7
  4. 2026Survival In-Context: Amortized Bayesian Survival Analysis via Prior-Fitted Networkscited by 6
  5. 2026One Loss to Rule Them All: Marked Time-to-Event for Structured EHR Foundation Modelscited by 5
  6. 2024MENSA: A Multi-Event Network for Survival Analysis with Trajectory-based Likelihood Estimationcited by 3
  7. 2025Competing Risks: Impact on Risk Estimation and Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 3
  8. 2025Prediction of Survival Outcomes under Clinical Presence Shift: A Joint Neural Network Architecturecited by 2
  9. 2025Whole-body Representation Learning For Competing Preclinical Disease Risk Assessmentcited by 1
  10. 2025Stepwise Fine and Gray: Subject-Specific Variable Selection Shows When Hemodynamic Data Improves Prognostication of Comatose Post-Cardiac Arrest Patientscited by 1
  11. 2024OPSurv: Orthogonal Polynomials Quadrature Algorithm for Survival Analysiscited by 0
  12. 2024Identifying treatment response subgroups in observational time-to-event datacited by 0
8 more
  1. 2024Wave-LSTM: Multi-scale analysis of somatic whole genome copy number profilescited by 0
  2. 2025CRISP-NAM: Competing Risks Interpretable Survival Prediction with Neural Additive Modelscited by 0
  3. 2025Deep Survival Analysis in Multimodal Medical Data: A Parametric and Probabilistic Approach with Competing Riskscited by 0
  4. 2025ADHAM: Additive Deep Hazard Analysis Mixtures for Interpretable Survival Regressioncited by 0
  5. 2025Interpretable Fine-Gray Deep Survival Model for Competing Risks: Predicting Post-Discharge Foot Complications for Diabetic Patients in Ontariocited by 0
  6. 2025Deep Kernel Aalen-Johansen Estimator: An Interpretable and Flexible Neural Net Framework for Competing Riskscited by 0
  7. 2026SSH-Net: A Deep Neural Network for Predicting Failure Time Distribution Functions under Competing Risks with Application to GPU Datacited by 0
  8. 2026NOAH: Learning the Full Patient Journey. A Longitudinal Multimodal Time-Aware Model for Representation and Forecastingcited by 0