mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Edge-Based Learning for Improved Classification Under Adversarial Noise

arXiv 2504.20077 ↗First posted 25 Apr 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial noise introduces small perturbations in images, misleading deep learning models into misclassification and significantly impacting recognition accuracy. In this study, we analyzed the effects of Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) adversarial noise on image classification and investigated whether training on specific image features can improve robustness. We hypothesize that while adversarial noise perturbs various regions of an image, edges may remain relatively stable and provide essential structural information for classification. To test this, we conducted a series of experiments using brain tumor and COVID datasets. Initially, we trained the models on clean images and then introduced subtle adversarial perturbations, which caused deep learning models to significantly misclassify the images. Retraining on a combination of clean and noisy images led to improved performance. To evaluate the robustness of the edge features, we extracted edges from the original/clean images and trained the models exclusively on edge-based representations. When noise was introduced to the images, the edge-based models demonstrated greater resilience to adversarial attacks compared to those trained on the original or clean images. These results suggest that while adversarial noise is able to exploit complex non-edge regions significantly more than edges, the improvement in the accuracy after retraining is marginally more in the original data as compared to the edges. Thus, leveraging edge-based learning can improve the resilience of deep learning models against adversarial perturbations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2025.

Builds on

23 of 31 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  4. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  6. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  7. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  8. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
  9. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
  10. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 790
  11. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 517
  12. 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 486
11 more
  1. 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 468
  2. 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 460
  3. 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 445
  4. 2017Defense against Adversarial Attacks Using High-Level Representation Guided Denoisercited by 329
  5. 2017Adversarial Attacks on Neural Network Policiescited by 320
  6. 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
  7. 2017On the (Statistical) Detection of Adversarial Examplescited by 180
  8. 2014Towards Deep Neural Network Architectures Robust to Adversarial Examplescited by 146
  9. 2018Parametric Noise Injection: Trainable Randomness to Improve Deep Neural Network Robustness against Adversarial Attackcited by 125
  10. 2020COVID-19 Image Data Collectioncited by 101
  11. 2024Attacking Large Language Models with Projected Gradient Descentcited by 94

Built on by

Not cited yet.