mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bayesian continual learning and forgetting in neural networks

arXiv 2504.13569 ↗First posted 18 Apr 2025cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Biological synapses effortlessly balance memory retention and flexibility, yet artificial neural networks still struggle with the extremes of catastrophic forgetting and catastrophic remembering. Here, we introduce Metaplasticity from Synaptic Uncertainty (MESU), a Bayesian framework that updates network parameters according their uncertainty. This approach allows a principled combination of learning and forgetting that ensures that critical knowledge is preserved while unused or outdated information is gradually released. Unlike standard Bayesian approaches -- which risk becoming overly constrained, and popular continual-learning methods that rely on explicit task boundaries, MESU seamlessly adapts to streaming data. It further provides reliable epistemic uncertainty estimates, allowing out-of-distribution detection, the only computational cost being to sample the weights multiple times to provide proper output statistics. Experiments on image-classification benchmarks demonstrate that MESU mitigates catastrophic forgetting, while maintaining plasticity for new tasks. When training 200 sequential permuted MNIST tasks, MESU outperforms established continual learning techniques in terms of accuracy, capability to learn additional tasks, and out-of-distribution data detection. Additionally, due to its non-reliance on task boundaries, MESU outperforms conventional learning techniques on the incremental training of CIFAR-100 tasks consistently in a wide range of scenarios. Our results unify ideas from metaplasticity, Bayesian inference, and Hessian-based regularization, offering a biologically-inspired pathway to robust, perpetual learning.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2025.

Builds on

20 of 51 references.

References · 20

  1. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  3. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  4. 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,472
  5. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
  6. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 819
  7. 2013An Empirical Investigation of Catastrophic Forgetting in Gradient-Based Neural Networkscited by 722
  8. 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
  9. 2018Progress & Compress: A scalable framework for continual learningcited by 520
  10. 2015Variational Dropout and the Local Reparameterization Trickcited by 490
  11. 2017Variational Continual Learningcited by 339
  12. 2018Understanding Measures of Uncertainty for Adversarial Example Detectioncited by 177
8 more
  1. 2019Uncertainty-guided Continual Learning with Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 102
  2. 2021The Bayesian Learning Rulecited by 99
  3. 2021Understanding Catastrophic Forgetting and Remembering in Continual Learning with Optimal Relevance Mappingcited by 48
  4. 2019A Unifying Bayesian View of Continual Learningcited by 38
  5. 2020Task Agnostic Continual Learning Using Online Variational Bayes with Fixed-Point Updatescited by 34
  6. 2021Synaptic metaplasticity in binarized neural networkscited by 29
  7. 2018VIBNN: Hardware Acceleration of Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 20
  8. 2022Statistical mechanics of continual learning: variational principle and mean-field potentialcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 8.

9 papers.